Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260596›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

On the influence of prior information evaluated by fully Bayesian criteria in a personalized whole-brain model of epilepsy spread.

Meysam Hashemi, Anirudh N Vattikonda, Viktor Sip, Sandra Diaz-Pier, Alexander Peyser, Huifang Wang, Maxime Guye, Fabrice Bartolomei, Marmaduke M Woodman, Viktor K Jirsa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Normative Modeling of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamic causal modelling in probabilistic programming languages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meysam HashemiAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5289-9837
Anirudh N VattikondaAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-3872
Viktor SipAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-9765
Sandra Diaz-PierSimLab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Institute for Advanced Simulation, JARA, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-5394
Alexander PeyserSimLab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC), Institute for Advanced Simulation, JARA, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3453-310X
Huifang WangAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-8649
Maxime GuyeAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-2257
Fabrice BartolomeiEpileptology Department, and Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Marmaduke M WoodmanAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.
Viktor K JirsaAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-8860
Inserm · FRForschungszentrum Jülich · DEAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized anatomical information has been used as prior knowledge in Bayesian inference paradigms of whole-brain network models. However, the actual sensitivity to such personalized information in priors is still unknown. In this study, we introduce the use of fully Bayesian information criteria and leave-one-out cross-validation technique on the subject-specific information to assess different epileptogenicity hypotheses regarding the location of pathological brain areas based on a priori knowledge from dynamical system properties. The Bayesian Virtual Epileptic Patient (BVEP) model, which relies on the fusion of structural data of individuals, a generative model of epileptiform discharges, and a self-tuning Monte Carlo sampling algorithm, is used to infer the spatial map of epileptogenicity across different brain areas. Our results indicate that measuring the out-of-sample prediction accuracy of the BVEP model with informative priors enables reliable and efficient evaluation of potential hypotheses regarding the degree of epileptogenicity across different brain regions. In contrast, while using uninformative priors, the information criteria are unable to provide strong evidence about the epileptogenicity of brain areas. We also show that the fully Bayesian criteria correctly assess different hypotheses about both structural and functional components of whole-brain models that differ across individuals. The fully Bayesian information-theory based approach used in this study suggests a patient-specific strategy for epileptogenicity hypothesis testing in generative brain network models of epilepsy to improve surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, BiologicalAdultAlgorithmsBrainComputational BiologyEpilepsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID34260596
PMCPMC8312957
OpenAlexW3181378126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.