Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260382›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.

Amy T Hansen, Todd Campbell, Se Jong Cho, Jonathan A Czuba, Brent J Dalzell, Christine L Dolph, Peter L Hawthorne, Sergey Rabotyagov, Zhengxin Lang, Karthik Kumarasamy and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. US climate policy yields water quality cobenefits in the Mississippi Basin and Gulf of Mexico.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Amy T HansenSt. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; amy.hansen@ku.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6152-9595
Todd CampbellCenter for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Se Jong ChoSt. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-6056
Jonathan A CzubaSt. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0002-9485-2604
Brent J DalzellDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-6562
Christine L DolphDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0003-3667-7809
Peter L HawthorneInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0003-1125-5239
Sergey RabotyagovSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Zhengxin LangSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Karthik KumarasamyDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
Patrick BelmontDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
Jacques C FinlayDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-7030
Efi Foufoula-GeorgiouSt. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-1078-231X
Karen B GranDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812.ORCID 0000-0001-9832-3016
Catherine L KlingCenter for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.ORCID 0000-0002-4785-7154
Peter WilcockDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-9829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of policy that strives to reduce nutrient and sediment export from agricultural fields, surface water quality in intensively managed agricultural landscapes remains highly degraded. Recent analyses show that current conservation efforts are not sufficient to reverse widespread water degradation in Midwestern agricultural systems. Intensifying row crop agriculture and increasing climate pressure require a more integrated approach to water quality management that addresses diverse sources of nutrients and sediment and off-field mitigation actions. We used multiobjective optimization analysis and integrated three biophysical models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative portfolios of watershed management practices at achieving nitrate and suspended sediment reduction goals in an agricultural basin of the Upper Midwestern United States. Integrating watershed-scale models enabled the inclusion of near-channel management alongside more typical field management and thus directly the comparison of cost-effectiveness across portfolios. The optimization analysis revealed that fluvial wetlands (i.e., wide, slow-flowing, vegetated water bodies within the riverine corridor) are the single-most cost-effective management action to reduce both nitrate and sediment loads and will be essential for meeting moderate to aggressive water quality targets. Although highly cost-effective, wetland construction was costly compared to other practices, and it was not selected in portfolios at low investment levels. Wetland performance was sensitive to placement, emphasizing the importance of watershed scale planning to realize potential benefits of wetland restorations. We conclude that extensive interagency cooperation and coordination at a watershed scale is required to achieve substantial, economically viable improvements in water quality under intensive row crop agricultural production.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisModels, TheoreticalAgricultureBudgetsCooperative BehaviorGeographyMinnesotaWater Qualityagricultureintegrated assessment modelingwater qualitywetlands

Identifiers

PMID34260382
PMCPMC8285912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.