Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260088›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2021

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 Indian variants: Are electrostatic potential changes responsible for a higher transmission rate?

Stefano Pascarella, Massimo Ciccozzi, Davide Zella, Martina Bianchi, Francesca Benedetti, Domenico Benvenuto, Francesco Broccolo, Roberto Cauda, Arnaldo Caruso, Silvia Angeletti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 mutations: An overview.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On the SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Infectious disease reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Zoonosis and zooanthroponosis of emerging respiratory viruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefano PascarellaDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-4022
Massimo CiccozziMedical Statistic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, University of Biomedical Campus, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-9239
Davide ZellaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Human Virology and Global Virus Network Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-5770
Martina BianchiDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2547-5999
Francesca BenedettiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Human Virology and Global Virus Network Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8720-090X
Domenico BenvenutoMedical Statistic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, University of Biomedical Campus, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-2927
Francesco BroccoloDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Prevention, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Roberto CaudaIstituto Clinica di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Arnaldo CarusoDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Silvia AngelettiUnit of Clinical Laboratory Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-8732
Marta GiovanettiLaboratório de Flavivírus, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-7326
Antonio CassoneCenter of of Genomics, Genetics and Biology, Siena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-0761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lineage B.1.617+, also known as G/452R.V3 and now denoted by WHO with the Greek letters δ and κ, is a recently described SARS-CoV-2 variant under investigation first identified in October 2020 in India. As of May 2021, three sublineages labeled as B.1.617.1 (κ), B.1.617.2 (δ), and B.1.617.3 have been already identified, and their potential impact on the current pandemic is being studied. This variant has 13 amino acid changes, three in its spike protein, which are currently of particular concern: E484Q, L452R, and P681R. Here, we report a major effect of the mutations characterizing this lineage, represented by a marked alteration of the surface electrostatic potential (EP) of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. Enhanced RBD-EP is particularly noticeable in the B.1.617.2 (δ) sublineage, which shows multiple replacements of neutral or negatively charged amino acids with positively charged amino acids. We here hypothesize that this EP change can favor the interaction between the B.1.617+ RBD and the negatively charged ACE2, thus conferring a potential increase in the virus transmission.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMutationProtein Structure, TertiarySARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusStatic ElectricitySpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusB.1.617 δ and κ variantselectrostatics potential changesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34260088
PMCPMC8426736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.