Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260031›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Cell Models in Autophagy Research.

Rui Huang, Shuyan Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rui HuangMedical School of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shuyan WuMedical School of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. wushuyan@suda.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is highly conserved in organisms ranging from yeast to humans. C. elegans, D. melanogaster, zebrafish, and mice have been extensively used to study autophagy, though each of them has shortcomings. Suitable cell models are very important, and there is considerable potential for them to help advance autophagy research. Cell models have advantages in speed, stability, economy, etc. Moreover, experimental conditions are more easily controlled in cell models than in animal models. More than 40 ATG genes have been found in budding yeast and other fungi since 1992. As a model organism, yeast has a unique place in autophagy research and has become the most widely used cell model. It is almost equal to E. coli in terms of rapid proliferation, ease of culture, and handling. Yeast is also a good host for eukaryotic gene expression and can be used for screens that help clarify the function of unknown genes. However, as a lower unicellular organism, it is unable to show tissue-specific regulation of autophagy. Cells from higher organisms, such as humans or other animals, are indispensable. Deeper and more extensive study of autophagy using cell models such as nervous tissue-derived cell models, epithelial tissue-derived cell models, muscle tissue-derived cell models, blood cell, and immune cell models has made significant progress.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsAutophagyEscherichia coliMiceZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.