Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259944›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2021

The Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19.

Maximilian Stelzer, Jörg Henes, Sebastian Saur

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Thromboembolism in the Complications of Long COVID-19.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Understanding COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association of Lupus Anticoagulant status with Disease Course in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximilian StelzerSchool of Medicine, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jörg HenesCentre for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Auto-inflammatory Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pulmology), University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Str. 10, DE 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sebastian SaurCentre for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Auto-inflammatory Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pulmology), University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Str. 10, DE 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. sebastian.saur@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-1207
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewElevated levels of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies are the most important criterion in the diagnosis of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) and are usually responsible for promoting the risk of thrombotic complications. Now, in the course of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, measurable aPL antibodies have also been detected in a noticeable number of patients showing a variety ranging from studies with only isolated positive tests to cohorts with very high positivity. Thus, the question arises as to whether these two different clinical pictures may be linked. RECENT

findingsThe ambivalent results showed a frequent occurrence of the investigated aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients to an individually varying degree. While some question a substantial correlation according to their results, a number of studies raise questions about the significance of a correlation of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients. Within the scope of this review, these have now been described and compared with each other. Ultimately, it is necessary to conduct further studies that specifically test aPL antibodies in a larger context in order to make subsequent important statements about the role of APS in COVID-19 and to further strengthen the significance of the described comparisons.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AnticardiolipinAntibodies, Antiphospholipidbeta 2-Glycoprotein ICOVID-19HumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLupus Coagulation InhibitorSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, AnticardiolipinAntibodies, Antiphospholipidbeta 2-Glycoprotein IImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLupus Coagulation InhibitorAntiphopsholipd antibodyAntiphospholipid syndromCovid-19

Identifiers

PMID34259944
PMCPMC8278370
OpenAlexW3180511595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.