Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259939›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2021

Comparative assessment of immunochromatographic test kits using somatic antigens from adult Opisthorchis viverrini and IgG and IgG4 conjugates for serodiagnosis of human opisthorchiasis.

Weeraya Phupiewkham, Lakkhana Sadaow, Oranuch Sanpool, Rutchanee Rodpai, Hiroshi Yamasaki, Wannaporn Ittiprasert, Victoria H Mann, Paul J Brindley, Wanchai Maleewong, Pewpan M Intapan

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Weeraya PhupiewkhamDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Lakkhana SadaowDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Oranuch SanpoolDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Rutchanee RodpaiDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Hiroshi YamasakiDepartment of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Wannaporn IttiprasertDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, Research Center for Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Victoria H MannDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, Research Center for Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Paul J BrindleyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, Research Center for Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. pbrindley@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002
Wanchai MaleewongDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Pewpan M IntapanDepartment of Parasitology and Excellence in Medical Innovation, and Technology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Mekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. pewpan@kku.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-8783
Khon Kaen University · THGeorge Washington University · USNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPRajamangala University of Technology · TH

Funding

Targeting parasite-host communication to combat liver fluke-induced bile duct cancerR01CA164719 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Paul J Brindley, THEWARACH LAHA · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic infections of humans with Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis spanning decades may lead to life-threatening pathology prior to cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which usually has a poor prognosis. Serological tools can support the parasitological examination in clinical diagnosis and support screening for risk of CCA. We developed novel immunochromatographic test kits using a soluble, somatic tissue extract of adult O. viverrini worms as an antigen and colloidal gold-labeled conjugates of IgG and IgG4 antibodies, and evaluated the diagnostic values of both the OvSO-IgG and OvSO-IgG4 kits. For diagnosis of human opisthorchiasis individually, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals in the OvSO-IgG kit were 86.6% (78.9-92.3), 89.5% (84.2-93.5), 82.9% (74.8-89.2), and 91.9% (87.0-95.4), respectively, while the 75% (65.9-82.7), 98.4% (95.5-99.7), 96.6% (90.3-99.3), and 87% (81.7-91.2), respectively, for the OvSO-IgG4 kit at the prevalence of infection of 37.1%. Twenty-three (76.7%) and 14 (46.7%) of 30 clonorchiasis sera showed positive reactivity with the OvSO-IgG and OvSO-IgG4 kits, respectively. There was 84.1% (κ-value = 0.649) concordance between the two kits, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Both ICT kits can be employed as quick and easy point-of-care diagnostic tools, and hence, the OvSO-IgG and OvSO-IgG4 kits can support expanded capacity for clinical diagnosis of human opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis. These kits may find utility in large-scale surveys in endemic areas where there are limited sophisticated medical facilities or capacity.

Indexed as

OpisthorchiasisOpisthorchisAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthChromatography, AffinityHumansImmunoglobulin GSerologic TestsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthImmunoglobulin GIgGIgG4Immunochromatographic test kitsOpisthorchiasisSerodiagnosisSomatic antigen

Identifiers

PMID34259939
PMCPMC8554465
OpenAlexW3178012912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.