ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021
Active robotic technologies for total knee arthroplasty.
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Inflammatory markers in conventional vs. active robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and other variables.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Survivorship in robotic total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Introduction of ROSA robotic-arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Article
- The use and future perspective of Artificial Intelligence-A survey among German surgeons.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhen active robotic technologies for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) were introduced over 20 years ago, broad usage of robotic technology was not felt to be needed as early data suggested no clear improvement in clinical outcomes compared to conventional techniques of implantation. Only recently has there been renewed enthusiasm for use of robotic technologies for implantation. MATERIALS AND
methodsActive robotic technology specifically refers to the use of a robot for planning and executing the surgical procedure-with surgeon guidance and control. The physical work of bone preparation is performed by a milling tool, following a cut path defined by a CT-based preoperative plan. This manuscript describes the IDE experience of the only active robotic system (ARoS) available in the US, which took place from February 2017 through December 2018.
results115 patients were enrolled in an IDE study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an ARoS for TKA. No previously described safety issues for TKA occurred. Three-dimensional accuracy of component placement used the preoperative CT plan compared to the 3-months postoperative CT scan to demonstrate accuracy of all autonomous resections to within 1.5 mm and/or 1.5 degrees. Surgical planning and execution to restore alignment along kinematic principles were used in 40 procedures and to achieve mechanical alignment in 75 procedures.
conclusionsThis FDA study of an active robotic approach for TKA represented the first multicenter trial and first US experience with this technology. Results demonstrated an excellent safety profile and high degree of accuracy. Advantages of this approach relate to standardization of the technique, multiple device options in the implant library, an excellent safety and accuracy profile, and consistency of results. Active robotics for TKA represents a viable and safe technique for primary TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.