ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2021
Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on machine-learning and change point algorithm.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01389843 (Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Registry (Prospective Cohort) for Heart Failure in Korea (KorAHF)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Stroke prevention in rural residents: development of a simplified risk assessment tool with artificial intelligence.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Trial
- Big Data and Trustworthy AI for Heart Failure: A Review.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Review
- Prediction of 90 day mortality in elderly patients with acute HF from e-health records using artificial intelligence.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Deep learning for predicting rehospitalization in acute heart failure: Model foundation and external validation.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Mortality Prediction in Patients With or Without Heart Failure Using a Machine Learning Model.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Outcomes and predictors of one-year mortality in patients hospitalized with Acute Heart Failure.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMachine learning (ML) algorithm can improve risk prediction because ML can select features and segment continuous variables effectively unbiased. We generated a risk score model for mortality with ML algorithms in East-Asian patients with heart failure (HF).
methodsFrom the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry, we used the data of 3683 patients with 27 continuous and 44 categorical variables. Grouped Lasso algorithm was used for the feature selection, and a novel continuous variable segmentation algorithm which is based on change-point analysis was developed for effectively segmenting the ranges of the continuous variables. Then, a risk score was assigned to each feature reflecting nonlinear relationship between features and survival times, and an integer score of maximum 100 was calculated for each patient.
resultsDuring 3-year follow-up time, 32.8% patients died. Using grouped Lasso, we identified 15 highly significant independent clinical features. The calculated risk score of each patient ranged between 1 and 71 points with a median of 36 (interquartile range: 27-45). The 3-year survival differed according to the quintiles of the risk score, being 80% and 17% in the 1st and 5th quintile, respectively. In addition, ML risk score had higher AUCs than MAGGIC-HF score to predict 1-year mortality (0.751 vs. 0.711, P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn East-Asian patients with HF, a novel risk score model based on ML and the new continuous variable segmentation algorithm performs better for mortality prediction than conventional prediction models. CLINICAL
trial registrationUnique identifier: INCT01389843 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01389843 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
34259921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.