Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259908›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Iatrogenic muscle damage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and adjacent segment degeneration: a comparative finite element analysis of open and minimally invasive surgeries.

Yogesh Kumaran, Anoli Shah, Akhil Katragadda, Adit Padgaonkar, Joseph Zavatsky, Robert McGuire, Hassan Serhan, Hossein Elgafy, Vijay K Goel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation as effective as bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Paraspinal muscular fat infiltration was associated with the development of adjacent segmental disease after microsurgical decompression without fusion for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changes in psoas and posterior paraspinal muscle morphology after standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a quantitative MRI-based analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yogesh KumaranThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US.
Anoli ShahThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US.
Akhil KatragaddaThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US.
Adit PadgaonkarThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US.
Joseph ZavatskySpine and Scoliosis Specialists, Tampa, FL, US.
Robert McGuireUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, US.
Hassan SerhanDepartments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, US.
Hossein ElgafyThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US.
Vijay K GoelThe Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Toledo, OH, US. Vijay.Goel@utoledo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLumbar procedures for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) range from open (OS) to minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) to preserve paraspinal musculature. We quantify the biomechanics of cross-sectional area (CSA) reduction of paraspinal muscles following TLIF on the adjacent segments.

methodsROM was acquired from a thoracolumbar ribcage finite element (FE) model across each FSU for flexion-extension. A L4-L5 TLIF model was created. The ROM in the TLIF model was used to predict muscle forces via OpenSim. Muscle fiber CSA at L4 and L5 were reduced from 4.8%, 20.7%, and 90% to simulate muscle damage. The predicted muscle forces and ROM were applied to the TLIF model for flexion-extension. Stresses were recorded for each model.

resultsIncreased ROM was present at the cephalad (L3-L4) and L2-L3 level in the TLIF model compared to the intact model. Graded changes in paraspinal muscles were seen, the largest being in the quadratus lumborum and multifidus. Likewise, intradiscal pressures and annulus stresses at the cephalad level increased with increasing CSA reduction.

conclusionsCSA reduction during the TLIF procedure can lead to adjacent segment alterations in the spinal element stresses and potential for continued back pain, postoperatively. Therefore, minimally invasive techniques may benefit the patient.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionFinite Element AnalysisHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresParaspinal MusclesRange of Motion, ArticularFinite element analysisIatrogenic muscle damageLumbar spineOpen and minimally invasive approachesTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.