Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259881›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options.

Michael Hummel, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, Jens H L Neumann, Arndt Vogel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael HummelInstitut für Pathologie der Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Virchowweg 16/17a, 10117, Berlin, Germany. michael.hummel@charite.de.
Susanna Hegewisch-BeckerOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Facharztzentrum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens H L NeumannPathologisches Institut der Medizinischen Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Arndt VogelKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEppendorf (Germany) · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 25 years, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone profound changes. The approval of newer chemotherapeutics such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin was followed in 2005 by the first targeted therapies, for example, monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as cetuximab and panitumumab, or the angiogenesis inhibitors bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept. With the rapidly progressing molecular characterization of mCRC in the last 10 years and the classification of the disease in four consensus subtypes, further changes are emerging, which will promote, among other things, the introduction of protein-kinase inhibitors developed for specific molecular aberrations as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment algorithm.Thorough molecular pathologic testing is indispensable today for guideline-compliant treatment of mCRC patients. In addition to RAS testing as a precondition for the therapy decision with regard to cetuximab and panitumumab, BRAF testing is of considerable relevance to allow decision making with regard to the newly approved chemotherapy-free combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and cetuximab in cases where a BRAF-V600E mutation is detected. Additional diagnostic tests should also include genome instability (microsatellite instability). Overall, more and more molecular alterations need to be investigated simultaneously, so that the use of focused next-generation sequencing is increasingly recommended.This overview describes the prognostic relevance of BRAF testing in the context of molecular pathologic diagnostics of mCRC, presents new treatment options for BRAF-mutated mCRC patients, and explains which modern DNA analytical and immunohistochemical methods are available to detect BRAF mutations in mCRC patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabHumansMutationProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antibodies, MonoclonalBRAF protein, humanCetuximabMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAF-inhibitorsCetuximabEncorafenibProtein kinase inhibitorsProto-oncogene proteins B‑raf

Identifiers

PMID34259881
PMCPMC8571135
OpenAlexW3180225128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.