Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259655›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2022

Prone-Positioning for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Matthieu Petit, Catalin Fetita, Augustin Gaudemer, Ludovic Treluyer, Guillaume Lebreton, Guillaume Franchineau, Guillaume Hekimian, Juliette Chommeloux, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Nicolas Brechot and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Respiratory care · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu PetitService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Catalin FetitaSAMOVAR, Telecom SudParis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Evry, France.
Augustin GaudemerService de Radiologie, APHP, Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Paris, France.
Ludovic TreluyerUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Guillaume LebretonSorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Guillaume FranchineauService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Guillaume HekimianService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Juliette ChommelouxService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Marc Pineton de ChambrunService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Nicolas BrechotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard LuytService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Alain CombesService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Matthieu SchmidtService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRInstitut Mines-Télécom · FRSorbonne Université · FRInstitut Polytechnique de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients prone-positioned during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung CT pattern associated with improved respiratory system static compliance after that intervention.

designRetrospective, single-center study over 8 years. SETTINGS: Twenty-six bed ICU in a tertiary center. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA propensity score-matched analysis compared patients with prone-positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those without. An increase of the static compliance greater than or equal to 3 mL/cm H2O after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders. The primary outcome was the time to successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning within 90 days of postextracorporeal membrane oxygenation start, with death as a competing risk. Among 298 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-treated adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, 64 were prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Although both propensity score-matched groups had similar extracorporeal membrane oxygenation durations, prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients' 90-day probability of being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and alive was higher (0.75 vs 0.54, p = 0.03; subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.54 [1.05-2.58]) and 90-day mortality was lower (20% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than that for no prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related complications were comparable for the two groups. Patients without improved static compliance had higher percentages of nonaerated or poorly aerated ventral and medial-ventral lung regions (p = 0.047).

conclusionsProne-positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was safe and effective and was associated with a higher probability of surviving and being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 90 days. Patients with greater normally aerated lung tissue in the ventral and medial-ventral regions on quantitative lung CT-scan performed before prone-positioning are more likely to improve their static compliance after that procedure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Indexed as

Prone PositionAdultExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedParisPatient PositioningProportional Hazards ModelsRespiratory Distress SyndromeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34259655
OpenAlexW3179581471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.