Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259562›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

A Pilot Study of Microbial Succession in Human Rib Skeletal Remains during Terrestrial Decomposition.

Heather Deel, Alexandra L Emmons, Jennifer Kiely, Franklin E Damann, David O Carter, Aaron Lynne, Rob Knight, Zhenjiang Zech Xu, Sibyl Bucheli, Jessica L Metcalf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Microbiology and postmortem interval: a systematic review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Microbial genomics: a potential toolkit for forensic investigations.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heather DeelProgram in Cell & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Alexandra L EmmonsDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jennifer KielyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State Universitygrid.263046.5, Huntsville, Texas, USA.
Franklin E DamannDefense POW/MIA Accounting Agency Laboratory, Offutt AFB, Nebraska, USA.
David O CarterLaboratory of Forensic Taphonomy, Forensic Sciences Unit, Chaminade University of Honolulugrid.253990.4, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Aaron LynneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State Universitygrid.263046.5, Huntsville, Texas, USA.
Rob KnightCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Zhenjiang Zech XuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sibyl BucheliDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State Universitygrid.263046.5, Huntsville, Texas, USA.
Jessica L MetcalfProgram in Cell & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bones of decomposing vertebrates are colonized by a succession of diverse microbial communities. If this succession is similar across individuals, microbes may provide clues about the postmortem interval (PMI) during forensic investigations in which human skeletal remains are discovered. Here, we characterize the human bone microbial decomposer community to determine whether microbial succession is a marker for PMI. Six human donor subjects were placed outdoors to decompose on the soil surface at the Southeast Texas Applied Forensic Science facility. To also assess the effect of seasons, three decedents were placed each in the spring and summer. Once ribs were exposed through natural decomposition, a rib was collected from each body for eight time points at 3 weeks apart. We discovered a core bone decomposer microbiome dominated by taxa in the phylum

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesBody RemainsHumansMicrobiotaPilot ProjectsRibsSeasonsSoil Microbiologyboneforensicsmicrobiomesuccessiontaphonomyvertebrate decomposition

Identifiers

PMID34259562
PMCPMC8386422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.