Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2021
Perinatal Outcomes of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02309138 (Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes (GDM2)
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gestational diabetes as a risk factor for GBS maternal rectovaginal colonization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (CDC4G) in Sweden: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.PLoS medicine · 2024Trial
- One-step versus two-step screening for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Iranian population: A randomized community trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Trial
- Patient Engagement Strategies for Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Low-Resource Community Health Settings: A Narrative Review and Clinical Principles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The role of continuous glucose monitoring for diagnosis of gestational diabetes: exploring the potential.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes with different screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2025Article
- One-step versus two-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women: a large non-randomized trial.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: the role of ethnicity and geography in risk and outcomes.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- Completion Rates for Ecological Momentary Assessments of Food Intake During Pregnancy and Post Partum: Descriptive Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Non-equivalence of Standard and Unified Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Clinical medicine & research · 2025Article
- The Hidden Impact of Gestational Diabetes: Unveiling Offspring Complications and Long-Term Effects.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gestational diabetes mellitus - more than the eye can see - a warning sign for future maternal health with transgenerational impact.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Review
- Plasma sFRP4 Levels and Their Relationship with HOMA IR in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- Problems in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by measurement of casual blood glucose levels at 24-28 gestational weeks.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Association of ideal cardiovascular health and history of gestational diabetes mellitus in NHANES 2007-2018.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy: New Insights Into Gestational Diabetes With More to Learn.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Infants of Mothers With Gestational Glucose Intolerance.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate differences in short-term perinatal outcomes between the two prominent screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and Carpenter-Coustan.
methodsIn this single-site, blinded, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial, participants received a nonfasting 50-g oral glucose tolerance test and, if less than 200 mg/dL (less than 11.1 mmol/L), were randomized to further screening with either IADPSG or Carpenter-Coustan criteria. Gestational diabetes treatment occurred per routine clinical care. The primary outcome was incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. Prespecified secondary outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, cesarean birth, and neonatal and maternal composites of adverse perinatal outcomes. Assuming a 15% incidence of LGA neonates in the Carpenter-Coustan group, 782 participants provided more than 80% power to detect a 7% absolute risk reduction with the use of IADPSG; planned recruitment was 920 for anticipated attrition.
resultsFrom June 2015 to February 2019, 1,016 participants were enrolled and 921 were randomized to IADPSG (n=461) or Carpenter-Coustan (n=460) groups. Gestational diabetes incidence (14.4% vs 4.5%, P<.001) and diabetes medication use (9.3% vs 2.4%; P<.001) were more common in the IADPSG group; there were no differences in LGA neonates, either overall (risk reduction 0.90, 97.5% CI 0.53-1.52) or among women without gestational diabetes (risk reduction 0.85, 97.5% CI 0.49-1.48). Those screened with IADPSG had higher rates of neonatal morbidity but fewer study-related adverse events. Rates of SGA neonates, cesarean birth, and maternal morbidity composite did not differ significantly between study groups.
conclusionsThe IADPSG screening criteria resulted in more women diagnosed and treated for gestational diabetes than Carpenter-Coustan without reducing the incidence of LGA birth weight or maternal or neonatal morbidity. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02309138.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.