Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34259458›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2021

Perinatal Outcomes of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Esa M Davis, Kaleab Z Abebe, Hyagriv N Simhan, Patrick Catalano, Tina Costacou, Diane Comer, Steven Orris, Kathleen Ly, Alison Decker, Dara Mendez and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02309138 (Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02309138 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes (GDM2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEsa M Davis, MD MPH FAAFPRan2015 to 2020Enrolled921ConditionsGestational Diabetes, Pregnancy, Glucose IntoleranceArmsGestational diabetes screening with fasting 3 hour 100 gm, Gestational diabetes screening with fasting 2 hour 75g
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with different screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Esa M DavisDepartment of Medicine, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis.
Kaleab Z Abebe
Hyagriv N Simhan
Patrick Catalano
Tina Costacou
Diane Comer
Steven Orris
Kathleen Ly
Alison Decker
Dara Mendez
Nancy Day
Christina M Scifres

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Comparison of two Screening Strategies for Gestational DiabetesR01HD079647 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAVIS, ESA M · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate differences in short-term perinatal outcomes between the two prominent screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and Carpenter-Coustan.

methodsIn this single-site, blinded, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial, participants received a nonfasting 50-g oral glucose tolerance test and, if less than 200 mg/dL (less than 11.1 mmol/L), were randomized to further screening with either IADPSG or Carpenter-Coustan criteria. Gestational diabetes treatment occurred per routine clinical care. The primary outcome was incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. Prespecified secondary outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, cesarean birth, and neonatal and maternal composites of adverse perinatal outcomes. Assuming a 15% incidence of LGA neonates in the Carpenter-Coustan group, 782 participants provided more than 80% power to detect a 7% absolute risk reduction with the use of IADPSG; planned recruitment was 920 for anticipated attrition.

resultsFrom June 2015 to February 2019, 1,016 participants were enrolled and 921 were randomized to IADPSG (n=461) or Carpenter-Coustan (n=460) groups. Gestational diabetes incidence (14.4% vs 4.5%, P<.001) and diabetes medication use (9.3% vs 2.4%; P<.001) were more common in the IADPSG group; there were no differences in LGA neonates, either overall (risk reduction 0.90, 97.5% CI 0.53-1.52) or among women without gestational diabetes (risk reduction 0.85, 97.5% CI 0.49-1.48). Those screened with IADPSG had higher rates of neonatal morbidity but fewer study-related adverse events. Rates of SGA neonates, cesarean birth, and maternal morbidity composite did not differ significantly between study groups.

conclusionsThe IADPSG screening criteria resulted in more women diagnosed and treated for gestational diabetes than Carpenter-Coustan without reducing the incidence of LGA birth weight or maternal or neonatal morbidity. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02309138.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornMass ScreeningPennsylvaniaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34259458
PMCPMC8288467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.