Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258875›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2022

Validation of a multi-species-specific PCR panel to diagnose patients with suspected postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis.

Justin van Halsema, Ruud Jansen, Adriaan Heineken, Tjaco M van Ossewaarde, Magda A Meester-Smoor, Jan C van Meurs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Justin van HalsemaThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-6847
Ruud JansenKennemerland Regional Laboratory, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Adriaan HeinekenThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tjaco M van OssewaardeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Magda A Meester-SmoorRotterdam Ophthalmic Research Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan C van MeursThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-7943
Erasmus MC · NLRotterdam Eye Hospital · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NL

Funding

Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en SlechtziendenStichting Combined Ophthalmic Research Rotterdam
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, patients suspected of endophthalmitis are referred to a tertiary centre for a vitreous biopsy and bacterial culture, thereby causing a treatment delay for the intravitreal antibiotics injection. We developed a new diagnostic tool, multi-mono-PCR (mm-PCR), not requiring viable bacteria, allowing antibiotic injection without delay. Performance of mm-PCR was tested on biopsies from patients with suspected postoperative endophthalmitis with known bacterial culture results.

methodsMost frequently occurring pathogens in endophthalmitis were determined using published data and treatment logs of endophthalmitis patient of the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Vitreous biopsies from patients with suspected endophthalmitis were aliquoted in two parts. One part was sent out for bacterial culture and another was stored at -80°C for mm-PCR analysis and, as a backup, also by panbacterial PCR. Twelve vitreous samples from patients not suspected of having endophthalmitis were added as control samples.

resultsConcordancy between bacterial culture and mm-PCR was 89% (24 of 27). All twelve control samples were negative. In three nonconcordant samples, the PCR results were most likely the correct ones.

conclusionmm-PCR results are highly concordant with bacterial culture. mm-PCR with panbacterial PCR as backup could be considered a diagnostic tool in patients with endophthalmitis, which would allow us to reverse the order of diagnosis and treatment while maintaining diagnostic surveillance, thereby preventing treatment delay.

Indexed as

EndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDNA, BacterialHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPostoperative ComplicationsVitreous BodyAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID34258875
PMCPMC9291183
OpenAlexW3180618612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.