Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258805›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Neuroprotective effects of four different fluids on cerebral ischaemia/reperfusion injury in rats through stabilization of the blood-brain barrier.

Reai Shan, Hongyan Zhou, Xinfang Liu, Guangjun Su, Guangsen Liu, Xiaoli Zhang, Cong Sun, Zining Yu, Lifang Zhan, Zhihua Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reai ShanDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Hongyan ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing, China.
Xinfang LiuKey Laboratory of Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases of Ministry of Education, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Guangjun SuKey Laboratory of Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases of Ministry of Education, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Guangsen LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Xiaoli ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Cong SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zining YuKey Laboratory of Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases of Ministry of Education, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Lifang ZhanDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zhihua HuangKey Laboratory of Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases of Ministry of Education, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2610-1999
Gannan Medical University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a potential strategy to treat cerebral ischaemic injury. We previously reported that hypertonic sodium chloride hydroxyethyl starch 40 (HSH) treatment alleviates brain injury induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO). However, other fluids, including 20% mannitol (MN), 3% hypertonic sodium chloride (HTS) and hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 solution (HES), have the same effect as HSH in cerebral ischaemia/reperfusion injury (CI/RI) remains unclear. The present study evaluated the protective effects of these four fluids on the BBB in tMCAO rats. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned to six groups. A CI/RI rat model was established by tMCAO for 120 min followed by 24 h of reperfusion. The sham and tMCAO groups were treated with normal saline (NS), whereas the other four groups were treated with the four fluids. After 24 h of reperfusion, neurological function, brain oedema, brain infarction volume, permeability of the BBB, cortical neuron loss and protein and mRNA expression were assessed. The four fluids (especially HSH) alleviated neurological deficits and decreased the infarction volume, brain oedema, BBB permeability and cortical neuron loss induced by tMCAO. The expression levels of GFAP, IL-1β, TNF-α, MMP-9, MMP-3, AQP4, MMP-9, PDGFR-β and RGS5 were decreased, whereas the expression levels of laminin and claudin-5 were increased. These data suggested that small-volume reperfusion using HSH, HES, MN and HTS ameliorated CI/RI, probably by attenuating BBB disruption and postischaemic inflammation, with HSH exerting the strongest neuroprotective effect.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaNeuroprotective AgentsReperfusion InjuryAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyNeuroprotective Agentsblood-brain barriercerebral ischaemia/reperfusionfluid infusionneuroprotection

Identifiers

PMID34258805
PMCPMC9292910
OpenAlexW3178834492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.