ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022
Robotic guidance platform for laser interstitial thermal ablation and stereotactic needle biopsies: a single center experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic systems in cranial surgery: a systematic review of accuracy, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing the benefits of digital twins in neurosurgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Physics-informed neural networks for predicting laser-tissue interaction in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Medical Digital Twin: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Design and Evaluation of Augmented Reality-Enhanced Robotic System for Epidural Interventions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The State-of-the-Art and Perspectives of Laser Ablation for Tumor Treatment.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Advancements in Glioma Care: Focus on Emerging Neurosurgical Techniques.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Application of Medical Image Navigation Technology in Minimally Invasive Puncture Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of an enhanced recovery protocol after laser ablation surgery protocol: a preliminary analysis.Neuro-oncology practice · 2023Article
- A Comparation Between Frame-Based and Robot-Assisted in Stereotactic Biopsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional structured-light robot-assisted frameless versus frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a retrospective study of 54 patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While laser ablation has become an increasingly important tool in the neurosurgical oncologist's armamentarium, deep seated lesions, and those located near critical structures require utmost accuracy during stereotactic laser catheter placement. Robotic devices have evolved significantly over the past two decades becoming an accurate and safe tool for stereotactic neurosurgery. Here, we present our single center experience with the MedTech ROSA ONE Brain robot for robotic guidance in laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and stereotactic biopsies. We retrospectively analyzed the first 70 consecutive patients treated with ROSA device at a single academic medical center. Forty-three patients received needle biopsy immediately followed by LITT with the catheter placed with robotic guidance and 27 received stereotactic needle biopsy alone. All the procedures were performed frameless with skull bone fiducials for registration. We report data regarding intraoperative details, mortality and morbidity, diagnostic yield and lesion characteristics on MRI. Also, we describe the surgical workflow for both procedures. The mean age was 60.3 ± 15 years. The diagnostic yield was positive in 98.5% (n = 69). Sixty-three biopsies (90%) were supratentorial and seven (10%) were infratentorial. Gliomas represented 54.3% of the patients (n = 38). There were two postoperative deaths (2.8%). No permanent morbidity related to surgery were observed. We did not find intraoperative technical problems with the device. There was no need to reposition the needle after the initial placement. Stereotactic robotic guided placement of laser ablation catheters and biopsy needles is safe, accurate, and can be implemented into a neurosurgical workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.