Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258707›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2021

A comprehensive survey on non-invasive wearable bladder volume monitoring systems.

Morteza Zakeri Nasrabadi, Hamideh Tabibi, Mahsa Salmani, Mahdieh Torkashvand, Eisa Zarepour

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. NIRS: Past, Present, and Future in Functional Urology.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morteza Zakeri NasrabadiSchool of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hamideh TabibiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa SalmaniSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdieh TorkashvandSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Eisa ZarepourSchool of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. zarepour@iust.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-5201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the volume of urine in the bladder is a significant issue in patients who suffer from the lack of bladder fullness sensation or have problems with timeliness getting to the restroom, such as spinal cord injury patients and some of the elderlies. Real-time monitoring of the bladder, therefore, can be highly helpful for urinary incontinence. Bladder volume monitoring technologies can be divided into two distinct categories of invasive and non-invasive. In invasive techniques, a catheter is directly inserted into the urethra to measure the amount of urine accurately. However, it is painful, limits the user's ordinary movements, and may hurt the urinary tract. Current non-invasive techniques measure the volume of the bladder from the skin using different stationary or portable apparatus at health centers. Both techniques have difficulties and are not cost-effective to use for a long period. Recently, both invasive and non-invasive methods have been attempted to be produced in the form of wearable devices utilizing different sensing and communication technologies. Wearable bladder monitoring devices can be easily used by patients with no or few clinical steps, making them much more affordable than non-wearable devices. While wearable devices seem to be a highly convenient and effective solution, they suffer from few drawbacks, such as relatively low precision. Hence, a great number of studies have been conducted to address these issues. In this article, we review and discuss non-invasive and minimally invasive methods for monitoring the bladder volume. We focus on the most practical and state-of-the-art methods employed in wearable devices, classify them by engineering and medical characteristics, and investigate their specifications, architectures, and measurement algorithms. This study aims to introduce the latest advances in this field to practitioners while comparing the advantages and disadvantages of existing approaches. Our study concludes with open problems and future trends in the area of bladder monitoring and measurement systems. Graphical abstract Wearable bladder monitoring system.

Indexed as

Urinary BladderWearable Electronic DevicesElectrocardiographyHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicBladder dysfunctionBladder monitoring systemsInternet of thingsNon-invasive monitoringWearable device

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.