ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
A comprehensive survey on non-invasive wearable bladder volume monitoring systems.
Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Ultrasound Devices for Continuous Bladder Monitoring: Emerging Utility and Current Limitations in Neurourology.International neurourology journal · 2026Article
- Integrated Ultrasound Device for Precision Bladder Volume Monitoring via Acoustic Focusing and Machine Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Future of Urodynamics: Innovations, Challenges, and Possibilities.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
- Recent Technological Advances in Monitoring and Neuromodulation of Non-Malignant and Neurogenic Bladder Conditions.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Towards Generalized Bioimpedance Models for Bladder Monitoring: The Role of Waist Circumference and Fat Thickness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Technology Use in Urinary Care: Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Advancing Bladder Health Diagnostics: The Potential of Optical Techniques for Noninvasive Assessment of Lower Urinary Tract Disorders.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Digital twin driven electrode optimization for wearable bladder monitoring via bioimpedance.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Urine non-contact sensor that evaluates multiple urination using capacitance change to inform when to replace inner diaper.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Verification of a system utilizing heartbeat-induced acoustic pulse waves for estimating the time at which bladder urine increases to a level requiring drainage among individuals with spinal cord injury.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- The Use of Technology in the Prevention of Infections Associated with Urinary Catheterization.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- Research progress and prospects of benefit-risk assessment methods for umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in the clinical treatment of spinal cord injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Conformable ultrasound breast patch for deep tissue scanning and imaging.Science advances · 2023Article
- State of the Art of Non-Invasive Technologies for Bladder Monitoring: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology.Micromachines · 2022Review
- NIRS: Past, Present, and Future in Functional Urology.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring the volume of urine in the bladder is a significant issue in patients who suffer from the lack of bladder fullness sensation or have problems with timeliness getting to the restroom, such as spinal cord injury patients and some of the elderlies. Real-time monitoring of the bladder, therefore, can be highly helpful for urinary incontinence. Bladder volume monitoring technologies can be divided into two distinct categories of invasive and non-invasive. In invasive techniques, a catheter is directly inserted into the urethra to measure the amount of urine accurately. However, it is painful, limits the user's ordinary movements, and may hurt the urinary tract. Current non-invasive techniques measure the volume of the bladder from the skin using different stationary or portable apparatus at health centers. Both techniques have difficulties and are not cost-effective to use for a long period. Recently, both invasive and non-invasive methods have been attempted to be produced in the form of wearable devices utilizing different sensing and communication technologies. Wearable bladder monitoring devices can be easily used by patients with no or few clinical steps, making them much more affordable than non-wearable devices. While wearable devices seem to be a highly convenient and effective solution, they suffer from few drawbacks, such as relatively low precision. Hence, a great number of studies have been conducted to address these issues. In this article, we review and discuss non-invasive and minimally invasive methods for monitoring the bladder volume. We focus on the most practical and state-of-the-art methods employed in wearable devices, classify them by engineering and medical characteristics, and investigate their specifications, architectures, and measurement algorithms. This study aims to introduce the latest advances in this field to practitioners while comparing the advantages and disadvantages of existing approaches. Our study concludes with open problems and future trends in the area of bladder monitoring and measurement systems. Graphical abstract Wearable bladder monitoring system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34258707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.