ArticleJournal for the measurement of physical behaviour2020
Evaluating the Performance of Sensor-based Bout Detection Algorithms: The Transition Pairing Method.
Article in Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validating the Longitudinal Assessment of Sedentary Behavior in a Randomized Controlled Trial via a Deep Learning Algorithm.Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour · 2026Article
- Calibration and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Physical Behavior Characterization: Protocol and Methods for the Free-Living Physical Activity in Youth (FLPAY) Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Convergent validity of time in bed estimates from activPAL and Actiwatch in free-living youth and adults.Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour · 2023Article
- CHAP-Adult: A Reliable and Valid Algorithm to Classify Sitting and Measure Sitting Patterns Using Data From Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Adults Aged 35.Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour · 2022Article
- CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Article
- The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2021Article
- Analytical Validation of Wrist-Worn Accelerometer-Based Step-Count Methods during Structured and Free-Living Activities.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bout detection algorithms are used to segment data from wearable sensors, but it is challenging to assess segmentation correctness. PURPOSE: To present and demonstrate the Transition Pairing Method (TPM), a new method for evaluating the performance of bout detection algorithms.
methodsThe TPM compares predicted transitions to a criterion measure in terms of number and timing. A true positive is defined as a predicted transition that corresponds with one criterion transition in a mutually exclusive pair. The pairs are established using an extended Gale-Shapley algorithm, and the user specifies a maximum allowable within-pair time lag, above which pairs cannot be formed. Unpaired predictions and criteria are false positives and false negatives, respectively. The demonstration used raw acceleration data from 88 youth who wore ActiGraph GT9X monitors (right hip and non-dominant wrist) during simulated free-living. Youth Sojourn bout detection algorithms were applied (one for each attachment site), and the TPM was used to compare predicted bout transitions to the criterion measure (direct observation). Performance metrics were calculated for each participant, and hip-versus-wrist means were compared using paired T-tests (α = 0.05).
resultsWhen the maximum allowable lag was 1-s, both algorithms had recall <20% (2.4% difference from one another, p<0.01) and precision <10% (1.4% difference from one another, p<0.001). That is, >80% of criterion transitions were undetected, and >90% of predicted transitions were false positives.
conclusionThe TPM improves on conventional analyses by providing specific information about bout detection in a standardized way that applies to any bout detection algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.