Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258524›Full record

ArticleJournal for the measurement of physical behaviour2020

Evaluating the Performance of Sensor-based Bout Detection Algorithms: The Transition Pairing Method.

Paul R Hibbing, Samuel R LaMunion, Haileab Hilafu, Scott E Crouter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul R HibbingThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies.
Samuel R LaMunionThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies.
Haileab HilafuThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Business Analytics and Statistics.
Scott E CrouterThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies.

Funding

Novel Approaches for Predicting Unstructured Short Periods of Physical Activities in YouthR01HD083431 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI CROUTER, SCOTT E, DING, WEI · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bout detection algorithms are used to segment data from wearable sensors, but it is challenging to assess segmentation correctness. PURPOSE: To present and demonstrate the Transition Pairing Method (TPM), a new method for evaluating the performance of bout detection algorithms.

methodsThe TPM compares predicted transitions to a criterion measure in terms of number and timing. A true positive is defined as a predicted transition that corresponds with one criterion transition in a mutually exclusive pair. The pairs are established using an extended Gale-Shapley algorithm, and the user specifies a maximum allowable within-pair time lag, above which pairs cannot be formed. Unpaired predictions and criteria are false positives and false negatives, respectively. The demonstration used raw acceleration data from 88 youth who wore ActiGraph GT9X monitors (right hip and non-dominant wrist) during simulated free-living. Youth Sojourn bout detection algorithms were applied (one for each attachment site), and the TPM was used to compare predicted bout transitions to the criterion measure (direct observation). Performance metrics were calculated for each participant, and hip-versus-wrist means were compared using paired T-tests (α = 0.05).

resultsWhen the maximum allowable lag was 1-s, both algorithms had recall <20% (2.4% difference from one another, p<0.01) and precision <10% (1.4% difference from one another, p<0.001). That is, >80% of criterion transitions were undetected, and >90% of predicted transitions were false positives.

conclusionThe TPM improves on conventional analyses by providing specific information about bout detection in a standardized way that applies to any bout detection algorithm.

Indexed as

ACCELEROMETERDYNAMIC SEGMENTATIONPERFORMANCE METRICSYOUTH SOJOURN MODELS

Identifiers

PMID34258524
PMCPMC8274497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.