Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258469›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2021

Protocol and short-term results for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a video intervention for Veterans with obesity: The TOTAL (Teaching Obesity Treatment Options to Adult Learners) pilot study.

Luke M Funk, Catherine R Breuer, Manasa Venkatesh, Anna Muraveva, Esra Alagoz, Bret M Hanlon, Susan D Raffa, Corrine I Voils

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03856320 (A Randomized Pilot Study of a Video-based Obesity Educational Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03856320 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Pilot Study of a Video-based Obesity Educational Intervention (CDA 15-060)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsObesity, Patient Education, Weight LossArmsEducational Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luke M FunkDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Catherine R BreuerDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Manasa VenkateshDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Anna MuravevaDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Esra AlagozDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Bret M HanlonDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
Susan D RaffaDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Durham, NC, USA.
Corrine I VoilsDepartment of Surgery, William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA.
William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAll three evidence-based treatment options for adults with severe obesity - behavioral weight management, weight management medications (WMM), and bariatric surgery - are underutilized in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Our objective in this study was to develop and pilot-test the TOTAL (Teaching Obesity Treatment Options to Adult Learners) intervention, which seeks to increase Veteran participation in obesity treatment.

methodsIn this single-site, parallel, pilot RCT, Veterans with severe obesity with an upcoming behavioral weight management visit were sent a recruitment letter after meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria via electronic health record screening. Eligible Veterans were randomized to TOTAL or usual care. TOTAL consisted of an 18-min video highlighting obesity health risks and treatment outcomes, eligibility criteria, and pros/cons of all three evidence-based obesity treatments. The primary outcomes were trial design feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) and acceptability to Veterans, which was assessed via semi-structured interviews with participants one week after randomization to TOTAL. Secondary outcomes included attitudes and self-efficacy to initiate treatment one week post-randomization and BMI change six months post-randomization (assessed via Cohen's d).

resultsForty-two Veterans were randomized (recruitment rate = 47.2%), and 40/42 completed one-week assessments (retention rate = 95.2%). The mean participant age was 59.2 ± 11.9 years. Female and non-White participants comprised 14.3% and 11.9% of the cohort, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with all 20 participants who received TOTAL suggested that the delivery logistics and content of TOTAL were acceptable to Veterans. Attitudes toward behavioral weight management and bariatric surgery and weight loss improved in TOTAL vs. usual care patients (Cohen's d ranging from 0.3 to 0.6).

conclusionsTOTAL was feasible to implement, acceptable to Veterans, and has the potential to increase obesity treatment participation in VHA. An adequately powered RCT is warranted to assess its impact on population-level weight loss.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03856320.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryBehavior changeObesityVeterans health administrationWeight lossWeight management medications

Identifiers

PMID34258469
PMCPMC8256180
OpenAlexW3177800843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.