Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258417›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2021

Gut microbiota absence and transplantation affect growth and intestinal functions: An investigation in a germ-free pig model.

Hua Zhou, Jing Sun, Bing Yu, Zuohua Liu, Hong Chen, Jun He, Xiangbing Mao, Ping Zheng, Jie Yu, Junqiu Luo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Long Term Culture of Germ-Free Zebrafish Using Gamma-Irradiated Feeds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua ZhouKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Jing SunKey Laboratory of Pig Industry Sciences, Rongchang, Chongqing 402460, China.
Bing YuKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Zuohua LiuKey Laboratory of Pig Industry Sciences, Rongchang, Chongqing 402460, China.
Hong ChenCollege of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan 625014, China.
Jun HeKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Xiangbing MaoKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Ping ZhengKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Jie YuKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Junqiu LuoKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Yuheng LuoKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Hui YanKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Liangpeng GeKey Laboratory of Pig Industry Sciences, Rongchang, Chongqing 402460, China.
Daiwen ChenKey Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNChongqing Academy of Animal Science · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate host-microbiota interactions and explore the effects of maternal gut microbiota transplantation on the growth and intestinal functions of newborns in a germ-free (GF) pig model. Twelve hysterectomy-derived GF Bama piglets were reared in 6 sterile isolators. Among them, 6 were considered as the GF group, and the other 6 were orally inoculated with healthy sow fecal suspension as fecal microbiota transplanted (FMT) group. Another 6 piglets from natural birth were regarded as the conventional (CV) group. The GF and FMT groups were hand-fed with Co60-γ-irradiated sterile milk powder, while the CV group was reared by lactating Bama sows. All groups were fed for 21 days. Then, all piglets and then were switched to sterile feed for another 21 days. Results showed that the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and concentrations of short-chain fatty acids in the GF group decreased (

Indexed as

Germ-freeGrowth performanceHost microbiota interactionIntestinal functionMaternal gut microbiota transplantationPig model

Identifiers

PMID34258417
PMCPMC8245803
OpenAlexW3159550569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.