Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258389›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer biology & research2015

Assessment of Breast Cancer Treatment Delay Impact on Prognosis and Survival: a Look at the Evidence from Systematic Analysis of the Literature.

Faustine Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer biology & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Total treatment interval and quality of life of women living with breast cancer in Ethiopia: the mediating role of financial toxicity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Intraoperative Flow Cytometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faustine WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Washington University, USA.

Funding

Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
Understanding Population Mental Health to Promote and Improve Mental Well-Being ZIAMD000015 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI WILLIAMS, FAUSTINE · 2020 to 2025
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MD000015NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer has remained the most commonly diagnosed disease among women globally. Despite the advancement in biomedical sciences leading to improve survival outcomes, some patients endure longer wait periods prior to initiation of treatment.

objectiveTo elucidate the impact of treatment delay on breast cancer patient's quality of life and survivorship. Second was to determine the optimal length of time (delay) between breast cancer diagnosis and start of first treatment in order to improve prognosis and general health and well-being of survivors.

methodsSystematic search of the literature was conducted across five electronic databases: Pub Med, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct as well as the reference list of all articles retrieved.

resultsA total of 33 articles were included in the evidence based systematic review, which comprised of 255,366 observations. The results of the studies were categorized under five main themes as: study characteristics, cancer staging and classification, treatment delay time definition and interval, treatment regimen classification and delay impact on quality of life and survival. Analyzed wait times from diagnosis to the initiation of first therapy ranged from 7 days to a period of over 180 days. Combinations of standardized treatment including loco-regional radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy surgery as well as hormonal therapy were examined. Even though some of the studies showed mixed results, overall, findings indicated that early detection, diagnosis and initiation of treatment within 90 days increase survival.

conclusionsEvidence revealed that delaying the initiation of treatment for breast cancer more than 90 days after diagnosis has a detrimental effect on disease free and overall well-being of survivors.

Indexed as

Breast cancerSurvivalTreatment delayTreatment initiation

Identifiers

PMID34258389
PMCPMC8274552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.