Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258316›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Prior Statin Use and Risk of Mortality and Severe Disease From Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Zachary A Yetmar, Supavit Chesdachai, Tarek Kashour, Muhammad Riaz, Danielle J Gerberi, Andrew D Badley, Elie F Berbari, Imad M Tleyjeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Metabolic Reprogramming in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Statins and Risk of Thrombosis in Critically ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zachary A YetmarDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-2868
Supavit ChesdachaiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-6411
Tarek KashourDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-0405
Muhammad RiazDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Danielle J GerberiMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-3915
Andrew D BadleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-7680
Elie F BerbariDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-5391
Imad M TleyjehDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5551-0353
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USKing Saud Medical City · SAQatar University · QA

Funding

Prime shock and kill for HIV erradicationR01AI110173 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BADLEY, ANDREW D · 2014 to 2024
$6.9M
Evaluating the role of the novel apoptosis inhibitor TRAILshort, in maintaining HIV persistence.R01AI120698 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BADLEY, ANDREW D · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Evaluating the role of the novel apoptosis inhibitor TRAILshort, in maintaining HIV persistenceR56AI120698 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BADLEY, ANDREW D · 2021 to 2021
$607k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110173NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120698NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI120698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatins up-regulate angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the receptor of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while also exhibiting pleiotropic antiviral, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Uncertainties exist about their effect on the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We sought to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis to examine the association between prior statin use and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsWe searched Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and the preprint server medRxiv from inception to December 2020. We assessed the quality of eligible studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale. We pooled adjusted relative risk (aRRs) of the association between prior statin use and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model and assessed heterogeneity using the

resultsOverall, 19 (16 cohorts and 3 case-control) studies were eligible, with a total of 395 513 patients. Sixteen of 19 studies had low or moderate risk of bias. Among 109 080 patients enrolled in 13 separate studies, prior statin use was associated with a lower risk of mortality (pooled aRR, 0.65 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .56-.77],

conclusionsCumulative evidence suggests that prior statin use is associated with lower risks of mortality or severe disease in patients with COVID-19. These data support the continued use of statins medications in patients with an indication for lipid-lowering therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19meta-analysismortalitySARS-CoV-2statins

Identifiers

PMID34258316
PMCPMC8244756
OpenAlexW3171226547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.