Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258279›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

A State-of-the-Art Review for Gastric Histopathology Image Analysis Approaches and Future Development.

Shiliang Ai, Chen Li, Xiaoyan Li, Tao Jiang, Marcin Grzegorzek, Changhao Sun, Md Mamunur Rahaman, Jinghua Zhang, Yudong Yao, Hong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pulse Signal Analysis Based on Deep Learning Network.BioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Shiliang AiMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-3269
Chen LiMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-8885
Xiaoyan LiCancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-1850
Tao JiangControl Engineering College, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China.
Marcin GrzegorzekInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Changhao SunMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-0349
Md Mamunur RahamanMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-2092
Jinghua ZhangMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-4752
Yudong YaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-0593
Hong LiMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.
Northeastern University · CNChengdu University of Information Technology · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CNShenyang Institute of Automation · CNStevens Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is a common and deadly cancer in the world. The gold standard for the detection of gastric cancer is the histological examination by pathologists, where Gastric Histopathological Image Analysis (GHIA) contributes significant diagnostic information. The histopathological images of gastric cancer contain sufficient characterization information, which plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. In order to improve the accuracy and objectivity of GHIA, Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) has been widely used in histological image analysis of gastric cancer. In this review, the CAD technique on pathological images of gastric cancer is summarized. Firstly, the paper summarizes the image preprocessing methods, then introduces the methods of feature extraction, and then generalizes the existing segmentation and classification techniques. Finally, these techniques are systematically introduced and analyzed for the convenience of future researchers.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsColorComputer-Aided DesignDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningPoisson DistributionReproducibility of ResultsStomachStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34258279
PMCPMC8257332
OpenAlexW3175644580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.