ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021
Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Patients Effectively Improves Immune Function.Disease markers · 2022Trial
- Patient and System Factors Associated with Second-generation Antipsychotic Metabolic Lab Monitoring, a Retrospective Cohort Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Cancer care disparities among patients with limited English proficiency: challenges and strategies for equity.BJC reports · 2025Review
- Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.Current epidemiology reports · 2025Review
- HPV knowledge and non-adherence to cervical cancer screening before and following the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Sexual Orientation and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Cisgender Women.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Assessing Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening with Pap Test by Disability Types.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.Preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An Exploratory Study of Primary Care Clinicians' Perspectives on 2021 New and Updated Cancer Screening Guidelines.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening delivery remains suboptimal. Understanding the multiple influences on use of screening is important to designing interventions. We describe the influence of patient, primary care provider (PCP), and clinic characteristics on whether a woman is up-to-date with cervical screening as of December 2016. PCPs (n = 194) and their female screen-eligible patients age 21-65 years (n = 32,115) were included in this cross-sectional analysis of patients from two primary care networks linked to a contemporaneous PCP survey. Principal independent variables
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.