Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34258172›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Reproductive healthcare denials among a privately insured population.

Luciana E Hebert, Erin E Wingo, Lee Hasselbacher, Kellie E Schueler, Lori R Freedman, Debra B Stulberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BeyondContraception: X · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana E HebertInstitute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, 1100 Olive Way, Ste 1200, Seattle, WA, USA.
Erin E WingoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1701 Divisadero St, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lee HasselbacherCenter for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 6030 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago IL, USA.
Kellie E SchuelerPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, 924 E 57th St, Ste #104, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lori R FreedmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 1701 Divisadero St, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Debra B StulbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify and examine reproductive healthcare denials experienced by individuals receiving employer-sponsored health insurance. We conducted a national cross-sectional survey using probability and non-probability-based panels from December 2019-January 2020. Eligible respondents were adults employed by any Standard and Poor's 500 company, who received employer-sponsored health insurance. Respondents (n = 1,001) reported whether anyone on their healthcare plan had been denied a reproductive healthcare service in the past five years and details about their denials. We conducted bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression to estimate factors associated with denials. Eleven percent of respondents (14% of women; 10% of men) reported a denial. Compared to lower-income respondents, those with income ≥ $50,000/year were less likely to experience a denial (aOR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.97). Compared to respondents who were never married, being married (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.03-5.30) or cohabiting (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.03-5.72) significantly increased odds of experiencing a denial. In 38% of cases the patient learned of the denial at a scheduled visit, while 23% learned in an emergency setting, and 13% after the encounter. Individuals covered by employer-sponsored health insurance continue to be denied coverage of preventive services. Employers and insurers can facilitate access to reproductive healthcare by ensuring that their plans include comprehensive coverage and in-network providers offer comprehensive services.

Indexed as

Affordable Care ActDenialHealth insuranceMaternity careNetwork coveragePrenatal CarePreventive careReproductive healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34258172
PMCPMC8254036
OpenAlexW3173723979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.