ArticleClinical & translational immunology2021
Are antibodies to fine specificities of citrullinated peptides/proteins useful for stratification of rheumatoid arthritis patients?
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn rheumatoid arthritis (RA), antibodies to citrullinated protein (ACPA) are believed to be heterogeneous and patient stratification by antibody profiling raised clinical interest for patient management. However, heterogeneity might be partially artificial because of the use of heterogeneous methods for ACPA detection. In recent work instead, we found that ACPA were mainly directed towards a single fibrin-derived peptide, β60-74BiotNt, but a comparative analysis with the presence of other ACPA specificities is still lacking.
objectivesTo present an overview of RA patients' stratification based on the detection of the main ACPA fine specificities with the same method as compared to that of anti-β60-74BiotNt antibodies.
methodsOver 4500 measurements were performed with more than 22 standardised ELISAs, sera from 180 RA patients and 200 to 436 non-RA rheumatic disease controls.
resultsFour to 81% of RA patients had ACPA towards various targets, confirming the heterogeneity of ACPA specificities. However, the subgroups of patients overlapped up to 97% with ACPA levels of correlation coefficients up to 0.8, showing redundancy of some targets. Multiplexing decreased diagnostic specificity from 95% to 64%. Instead, anti-β60-74BiotNt detection identified almost all ACPA-positive patients.
conclusionsAntibodies to citrullinated protein multiplexing shows some degree of redundancy and is not suitable for diagnostic purposes. ACPA fine specificities might be less heterogeneous than perceived by sera testing on multiple peptides. Patient stratification largely depends on detection methods and requires standardisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.