Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257764›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2021

Modulatory Effect of Probiotic

Hiva Alipour, Parisa Gazerani, Mahmoud Heidari, Fereshteh Dardmeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Heat-TreatedCells · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hiva AlipourDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-4208
Parisa GazeraniDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-3600
Mahmoud HeidariDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-2491
Fereshteh DardmehDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-0147
Aalborg University · DKIslamic Azad University of Gorgan · IROsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obese animals and humans demonstrate higher sensitivity to pain stimuli. Among the endogenous factors prompting obesity, the intestinal microbiota has been proposed to influence responsiveness to pain. The beneficial effects of probiotics on obesity are well documented, whereas data on their analgesic efficacy is minimal. The protective effect of probiotics on nociception in diet-induced obese male mice has been previously demonstrated, but the sex differences in pain sensitivity and analgesic response do not allow for the generalization of these findings to the female gender. Hence, this study aimed at investigating the potential effects of oral probiotic supplementation on mechanical pain thresholds in female diet-induced obese mice compared with controls. Thirty-two adult female mice (

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusObesityProbioticsAnimalsDiet, High-FatDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMice

Identifiers

PMID34257764
PMCPMC8261181
OpenAlexW3175127434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.