Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257581›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2021

Cell-free DNA From Pleural Effusion Samples: Is It Right for Molecular Testing in Lung Adenocarcinoma?

Attila Mokánszki, Emese Sarolta Bádon, Anikó Mónus, László Tóth, Nóra Bittner, Gábor Méhes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Attila MokánszkiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Emese Sarolta BádonDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Anikó MónusDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
László TóthDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Nóra BittnerDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gábor MéhesDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic molecular features gained specific significance in therapeutic decisions in lung carcinoma in the past decade. Initial and follow up genetic testing requres appropriate amounts and quality of tumor derived DNA, but tumor sampling, especially for disease monitoring is generally limited. Further to the peripheral blood (PB), samples from pleural fluid, accumulating in diverse lung processes might serve as an alternative source for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for genetic profiling. In our study, cfDNA isolated from the pleural effusion and from the PB, and genomic DNA (gDNA) obtained from tissue/cellular samples were analyzed and compared from altogether 65 patients with pulmonary disease, including 36 lung adenocarcinomas. The quantity of effusion cfDNA yield appeared to be significantly higher compared to that from simultaneously collected PB plasma (23.2 vs. 4.8 ng/μl,

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCirculating Tumor DNADNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPleural Effusion, MalignantCirculating Tumor DNAcytological cell blockliquid biopsylung carcinomamutation analysispleural effusion fluid

Identifiers

PMID34257581
PMCPMC8262152
OpenAlexW3149671281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.