Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257466›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on information theory2021

Levenshtein Distance, Sequence Comparison and Biological Database Search.

Bonnie Berger, Michael S Waterman, Yun William Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on information theory, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bonnie Berger *Department of Mathematics and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA, and also with the Department of Computer Science and AI Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-7228
Michael S Waterman *Quantitative and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
Yun William Yu *Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada, and also with the Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-9576

Funding

Compressive genomics for large omics data sets: Algorithms applications & toolsR01GM108348 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2013 to 2019
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levenshtein edit distance has played a central role-both past and present-in sequence alignment in particular and biological database similarity search in general. We start our review with a history of dynamic programming algorithms for computing Levenshtein distance and sequence alignments. Following, we describe how those algorithms led to heuristics employed in the most widely used software in bioinformatics, BLAST, a program to search DNA and protein databases for evolutionarily relevant similarities. More recently, the advent of modern genomic sequencing and the volume of data it generates has resulted in a return to the problem of local alignment. We conclude with how the mathematical formulation of Levenshtein distance as a metric made possible additional optimizations to similarity search in biological contexts. These modern optimizations are built around the low metric entropy and fractional dimensionality of biological databases, enabling orders of magnitude acceleration of biological similarity search.

Indexed as

dynamic programmingLevenshtein distancemetric entropysequence comparisonsimilarity search

Identifiers

PMID34257466
PMCPMC8274556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.