Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257359›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Circulating immune biomarkers in peripheral blood correlate with clinical outcomes in advanced breast cancer.

Natalia Palazón-Carrión, Carlos Jiménez-Cortegana, M Luisa Sánchez-León, Fernando Henao-Carrasco, Esteban Nogales-Fernández, Massimo Chiesa, Rosalía Caballero, Federico Rojo, María-Adoración Nieto-García, Víctor Sánchez-Margalet and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Palazón-CarriónClinical Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Carlos Jiménez-CorteganaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Immunology, School of Medicine, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
M Luisa Sánchez-LeónClinical Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Fernando Henao-CarrascoClinical Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Esteban Nogales-FernándezClinical Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Massimo ChiesaGEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group), Madrid, Spain.
Rosalía CaballeroGEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group), Madrid, Spain.
Federico RojoPathology Department, IIS-Fundación Jimenez Diaz-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
María-Adoración Nieto-GarcíaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Víctor Sánchez-MargaletDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Immunology, School of Medicine, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. margalet@us.es.ORCID 0000-0001-8638-8680
Luis de la Cruz-MerinoClinical Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain. ldelacruzmerino@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-0535
Spanish Breast Cancer Group (GEICAM) and the Spanish Group for Immunobiotherapy of Cancer (GÉTICA)
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESGEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of the different elements intervening at the tumor microenvironment seems key to explain clinical evolution in several tumor types. In this study, a set of immune biomarkers (myeloid derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and OX40 + and PD-1 + T lymphocytes counts) in peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer were analyzed along of first line antineoplastic therapy. Subsequently, a comparison between groups with clinical benefit versus progression of disease and with a healthy women cohort was executed. Results reflected that patients showed higher basal levels of myeloid derived suppressor cells (35.43, IR = 180.73 vs 17.53, IR = 16.96 cells/μl; p = 0.001) and regulatory T cells (32.05, IR = 29.84 vs 22.61, IR = 13.57 cells/μl; p = 0.001) in comparison with healthy women. Furthermore, an increase in the number of activated T lymphocytes (expressing OX40), a decrease of immune inhibitory cells (MDSCs and Tregs) and inhibited T lymphocytes (expressing PD-1) were observed along the treatment in patients with clinical benefit (p ≤ 0.001). The opposite trend was observed in the case of disease progression. These findings suggest that some critical immune elements can be easily detected and measured in peripheral blood, which open a new opportunity for translational research, as they seem to be correlated with clinical evolution, at least in ABC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID34257359
PMCPMC8277895
OpenAlexW3135903580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.