Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257310›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Sensing leg movement enhances wearable monitoring of energy expenditure.

Patrick Slade, Mykel J Kochenderfer, Scott L Delp, Steven H Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Smart Headband for Multimodal Physiological Monitoring in Human Exercises.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Composite activity type and stride-specific energy expenditure estimation model for thigh-worn accelerometry.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick SladeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. patslade@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9302-3911
Mykel J KochenderferDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-9663
Scott L DelpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Steven H CollinsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
National Center for Simulation in Rehabilitation ResearchR24HD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2010 to 2014
$4.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD065690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of global mortality. Health organizations have requested a tool to objectively measure physical activity. Respirometry and doubly labeled water accurately estimate energy expenditure, but are infeasible for everyday use. Smartwatches are portable, but have significant errors. Existing wearable methods poorly estimate time-varying activity, which comprises 40% of daily steps. Here, we present a Wearable System that estimates metabolic energy expenditure in real-time during common steady-state and time-varying activities with substantially lower error than state-of-the-art methods. We perform experiments to select sensors, collect training data, and validate the Wearable System with new subjects and new conditions for walking, running, stair climbing, and biking. The Wearable System uses inertial measurement units worn on the shank and thigh as they distinguish lower-limb activity better than wrist or trunk kinematics and converge more quickly than physiological signals. When evaluated with a diverse group of new subjects, the Wearable System has a cumulative error of 13% across common activities, significantly less than 42% for a smartwatch and 44% for an activity-specific smartwatch. This approach enables accurate physical activity monitoring which could enable new energy balance systems for weight management or large-scale activity monitoring.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesEnergy MetabolismExerciseHumansLegWalking

Identifiers

PMID34257310
PMCPMC8277831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.