Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34257092›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Are the rights of people with disabilities included in international guidance on WASH during the COVID-19 pandemic? Content analysis using EquiFrame.

Nathaniel Scherer, Islay Mactaggart, Chelsea Huggett, Pharozin Pheng, Mahfuj-Ur Rahman, Jane Wilbur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nathaniel SchererClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK nathaniel.scherer@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1846-8691
Islay MactaggartClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-0384
Chelsea HuggettWaterAid Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Pharozin PhengWaterAid Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mahfuj-Ur RahmanWaterAid Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jane WilburClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-1337
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBDocumentation Center of Cambodia · KHInstitute of Water Modelling · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople with disabilities are at increased risk from COVID-19. Access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services and facilities is a fundamental right for all, and is vital in stopping the transmission of COVID-19. However, people with disabilities often face difficulties accessing WASH. Various international organisations have published guidance and recommendations on WASH service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this must include information of relevance to people with disabilities. This study aimed to investigate the inclusion of core concepts of rights for people with disabilities in guidance on WASH during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodWe used the EquiFrame content analysis tool to analyse the inclusion of 21 core concepts of rights for people with disabilities in international guidance documents on WASH during the pandemic. 29 documents were included from multilateral entities, international consortiums and non-governmental organisations. Key information from the included guidance documents was extracted for each of the 21 core concepts.

resultsOne-third of the WASH guidance did not include any reference to the rights of people with disabilities, and the majority of information was provided by just one guidance document. Most commonly referenced across all was access to WASH, including details on accessible infrastructure (eg, handwashing stations) and communication strategies. Information on many important rights and considerations, such as the affordability of services and caregiver support, was rarely included.

conclusionAlthough some information is provided in international WASH guidance, this often has a narrow focus on access, rather than the full array of rights and considerations that are important for people with disabilities. International guidance should continue to be reviewed and updated to include further information of relevance to people with disabilities, informing a disability-inclusive approach to WASH during the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic and future crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesHumansHygienePandemicsSanitationSARS-CoV-2WaterWaterCOVID-19Health policyinternational health servicespublic health

Identifiers

PMID34257092
PMCPMC8282413
OpenAlexW3180650327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.