Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34256819›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hematology & oncology2021

Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML.

Jorge E Cortes, Tara L Lin, Geoffrey L Uy, Robert J Ryan, Stefan Faderl, Jeffrey E Lancet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01696084 (Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Trial of CPX-351), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01696084 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Trial of CPX-351 (Cytarabine:Daunorubicin) Liposome Injection Versus Cytarabine and Daunorubicin in Patients 60-75 Years of Age With Untreated High Risk (Secondary) AML

TypeinterventionalSponsorJazz PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2015Enrolled309ConditionsHigh Risk Acute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsCPX-351, 7+3 (cytarabine and daunorubicin)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Nanomedicine-Based Strategies for Multiple Myeloma Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge E CortesGeorgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Rd., CN2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. Jorge.Cortes@augusta.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-1071
Tara L LinUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Geoffrey L UyWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Robert J RyanJazz Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stefan FaderlJazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeffrey E LancetH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USAugusta University Health · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCPX-351 (United States: Vyxeos

methodsPatients were randomized 1:1 between December 20, 2012 and November 11, 2014 to receive induction with CPX-351 or 7 + 3. Survival time for each patient was partitioned into 3 health states: TOX (time with any grade 3 or 4 toxicity or prior to remission), TWiST (time in remission without relapse or grade 3 or 4 toxicity), and REL (time after relapse). Within each treatment arm, Q-TWiST was calculated by adding the mean time spent in each health state weighted by its respective quality-of-life, represented by health utility. The relative Q-TWiST gain, calculated as the difference in Q-TWiST between treatment arms divided by the mean survival of the 7 + 3 control arm, was determined in order to evaluate results in the context of other Q-TWiST analyses.

resultsThe relative Q-TWiST gain with CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 was 53.6% in the base case scenario and 39.8% among responding patients. Across various sensitivity analyses, the relative Q-TWiST gains for CPX-351 ranged from 48.0 to 57.6%, remaining well above the standard clinically important difference threshold of 15% for oncology.

conclusionsThis post hoc analysis demonstrates that CPX-351 improved quality-adjusted survival, further supporting the clinical benefit in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Trial registration This trial was registered on September 28, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01696084 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01696084 ) and is complete.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineDaunorubicinFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryQuality of LifeSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsCPX-351CytarabineDaunorubicinAcute myeloid leukemiaChemotherapyQuality-of-lifeRelapseSurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID34256819
PMCPMC8276472
OpenAlexW3179177879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.