Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34256799›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Automatically evaluating balance using machine learning and data from a single inertial measurement unit.

Fahad Kamran, Kathryn Harrold, Jonathan Zwier, Wendy Carender, Tian Bao, Kathleen H Sienko, Jenna Wiens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fahad KamranComputer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. fhdkmrn@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2488-8887
Kathryn HarroldMechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jonathan ZwierMechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Wendy CarenderDepartment of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA.
Tian BaoMechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Kathleen H SienkoMechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jenna WiensComputer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation CBET-1804945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, machine learning techniques have been applied to data collected from inertial measurement units to automatically assess balance, but rely on hand-engineered features. We explore the utility of machine learning to automatically extract important features from inertial measurement unit data for balance assessment.

findingsTen participants with balance concerns performed multiple balance exercises in a laboratory setting while wearing an inertial measurement unit on their lower back. Physical therapists watched video recordings of participants performing the exercises and rated balance on a 5-point scale. We trained machine learning models using different representations of the unprocessed inertial measurement unit data to estimate physical therapist ratings. On a held-out test set, we compared these learned models to one another, to participants' self-assessments of balance, and to models trained using hand-engineered features. Utilizing the unprocessed kinematic data from the inertial measurement unit provided significant improvements over both self-assessments and models using hand-engineered features (AUROC of 0.806 vs. 0.768, 0.665).

conclusionsUnprocessed data from an inertial measurement unit used as input to a machine learning model produced accurate estimates of balance performance. The ability to learn from unprocessed data presents a potentially generalizable approach for assessing balance without the need for labor-intensive feature engineering, while maintaining comparable model performance.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesBiomechanical PhenomenaExerciseExercise TherapyHumansMachine LearningBalance trainingMachine learningTelerehabilitationWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID34256799
PMCPMC8278701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.