Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34256794›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Dynamics of the complex food environment underlying dietary intake in low-income groups: a systems map of associations extracted from a systematic umbrella literature review.

Alexia D M Sawyer, Frank van Lenthe, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Laura Terragni, Gun Roos, Maartje P Poelman, Mary Nicolaou, Wilma Waterlander, Sanne K Djojosoeparto, Marie Scheidmeir and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
28.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexia D M SawyerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Room J2-211, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. alexia.sawyer@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-4814
Frank van LentheDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Carlijn B M KamphuisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Laura TerragniDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Gun RoosConsumer Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0170, Oslo, Norway.
Maartje P PoelmanDepartment of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
Mary NicolaouDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Room J2-211, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Wilma WaterlanderDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Room J2-211, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Sanne K DjojosoepartoDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands.
Marie ScheidmeirPsychology Institute, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55122, Mainz, Germany.
Agnieszka Neumann-PodczaskaDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Room J2-211, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
PEN Consortium
University of Amsterdam · NLOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUtrecht University · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInequalities in obesity pertain in part to differences in dietary intake in different socioeconomic groups. Examining the economic, social, physical and political food environment of low-income groups as a complex adaptive system - i.e. a system of multiple, interconnected factors exerting non-linear influence on an outcome, can enhance the development and assessment of effective policies and interventions by honouring the complexity of lived reality. We aimed to develop and apply novel causal loop diagramming methods in order to construct an evidence-based map of the underlying system of environmental factors that drives dietary intake in low-income groups.

methodsA systematic umbrella review was conducted on literature examining determinants of dietary intake and food environments in low-income youths and adults in high/upper-middle income countries. Information on the determinants and associations between determinants was extracted from reviews of quantitative and qualitative studies. Determinants were organised using the Determinants of Nutrition and Eating (DONE) framework. Associations were synthesised into causal loop diagrams that were subsequently used to interpret the dynamics underlying the food environment and dietary intake. The map was reviewed by an expert panel and systems-based analysis identified the system paradigm, structure, feedback loops and goals.

resultsFindings from forty-three reviews and expert consensus were synthesised in an evidence-based map of the complex adaptive system underlying the food environment influencing dietary intake in low-income groups. The system was interpreted as operating within a supply-and-demand, economic paradigm. Five sub-systems ('geographical accessibility', 'household finances', 'household resources', 'individual influences', 'social and cultural influences') were presented as causal loop diagrams comprising 60 variables, conveying goals which undermine healthy dietary intake.

conclusionsOur findings reveal how poor dietary intake in low-income groups can be presented as an emergent property of a complex adaptive system that sustains a food environment that increases the accessibility, availability, affordability and acceptability of unhealthy foods. In order to reshape system dynamics driving unhealthy food environments, simultaneous, diverse and innovative strategies are needed to facilitate longer-term management of household finances and socially-oriented practices around healthy food production, supply and intake. Ultimately, such strategies must be supported by a system paradigm which prioritises health.

Indexed as

DietEthnicityFood SupplyPovertyAdolescentAgedCanadaChildChild, PreschoolEatingFemaleHumansMinority GroupsPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsComplex adaptive systemsDietFood environmentInequalityLow-income groupsSystem dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34256794
PMCPMC8276221
OpenAlexW3180830633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.