Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34256135›Full record

ArticleJournal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus2021

Validation of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a normal preschool population.

Shaival S Shah, Jennifer J Jimenez, Emily J Rozema, Miki T Nguyen, Melissa Preciado, Ashish M Mehta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Multifaceted Amblyopia Screening with blinq, 2WIN, and PDI Check.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaival S ShahSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Ophthalmology. Electronic address: Shaival.S.Shah@kp.org.
Jennifer J JimenezSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Research & Evaluation.
Emily J RozemaSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Research & Evaluation.
Miki T NguyenSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Research & Evaluation.
Melissa PreciadoSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Research & Evaluation.
Ashish M MehtaSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Ophthalmology.
Colorado Permanente Medical Group · US

Funding

Supplemental support to remove FDA restriction on language for usageR44EY025926 · NEI · REBISCAN, LLC · PI HUNTER, DAVID G, SHAKA, JUSTIN · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R44 EY025926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the Pediatric Vision Scanner (PVS), a handheld vision screening device designed to test for amblyopia and strabismus, in a general pediatric population.

methodsIn this prospective study, trained research staff screened 300 eligible children 24-72 months of age with no known eye conditions for amblyopia and strabismus using the PVS. A pediatric ophthalmologist masked to PVS screening results then performed a comprehensive eye examination. Sensitivity and specificity of the PVS was calculated with a 95% confidence interval.

resultsBased on the gold standard eye examination, 6 children (2%) had amblyopia and/or strabismus. The PVS detected all 6 cases, yielding a sensitivity rate of 100% (95% CI, 54%-100%). The PVS referred 45 additional children (15%) who had normal ophthalmic findings, yielding a specificity rate of 85% (95% CI, 80%-89%). The median acquisition time for the PVS was 28 seconds.

conclusionsThe PVS detected amblyopia with high sensitivity in a nonenriched pediatric population. The device would allow children with amblyopia and/or strabismus to be referred to an eye care specialist as early as 2 years old. Given its short acquisition time, the PVS can be implemented in a pediatric clinic with minimal impact on workflow.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaRefractive ErrorsStrabismusVision ScreeningChildChild, PreschoolHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34256135
PMCPMC8449817
OpenAlexW3181885023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.