ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2021
New approaches to predict the effect of co-occurring variants on protein characteristics.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- NAVIP: Unraveling the influence of neighboring small sequence variants on functional impact prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Language Modelling Techniques for Analysing the Impact of Human Genetic Variation.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025Review
- Variant Effect Prediction in the Age of Machine Learning.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- In silico methods for predicting functional synonymous variants.Genome biology · 2023Review
- Insights into Mechanisms of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Driven by Known or New Genetic Drivers.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the effect of a mutated gene before the onset of symptoms of genetic diseases would greatly facilitate diagnosis and potentiate early intervention. There have been myriad attempts to predict the effects of single-nucleotide variants. However, the applicability of these efforts does not scale to co-occurring variants. Furthermore, an increasing number of protein therapeutics contain co-occurring nucleotide variations, adding uncertainty during development to the safety and efficiency of these drugs. Co-occurring nucleotide variants may often have synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects on protein attributes, further complicating the task of outcome prediction. We tested four models based on the cooperative and antagonistic effects of co-occurring variants to predict pathogenicity and effectiveness of protein therapeutics. A total of 30 attributes, including amino acid and nucleotide features, as well as existing single-variant effect prediction tools, were considered on the basis of previous studies on single-nucleotide variants. Importantly, the effects of synonymous variants, often seen in protein therapeutics, were also included in our models. We used 12 datasets of people with monogenic diseases and controls with co-occurring genetic variants to evaluate the accuracy of our models, accomplishing a degree of accuracy comparable to that of prediction tools for single-nucleotide variants. More importantly, our framework is generalizable to new, well-curated datasets of monogenic diseases and new variant scoring tools. This approach successfully assists in addressing the challenging task of predicting the effect of co-occurring variants on pathogenicity and protein effectiveness and is applicable for a wide range of protein therapeutics and genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.