Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34256003›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Development, implementation and impact of a new preprint solicitation process at

Maurine Neiman, Robin K Bagley, Dorota Paczesniak, Shalene Singh-Shepherd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurine NeimanDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Robin K BagleyDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University at Lima, Lima, OH 45804, USA.
Dorota PaczesniakDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu 90014, Finland.
Shalene Singh-ShepherdThe Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprints are manuscripts posted on a public server that do not yet have formal certification of peer review from a scholarly journal. The increasingly prominent online repositories for these preprints provide a means of rapidly making scientific results accessible to all with an Internet connection. We here describe the catalysis and subsequent development of a successful new process to solicit preprints for consideration for publication in

Indexed as

early-career scientistspeer reviewpreprintProceedings BRoyal Society of London

Identifiers

PMID34256003
PMCPMC8277468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.