ArticleMuscle & nerve2021
Longitudinal motor function in proximal versus distal DMD pathogenic variants.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Influence of community disadvantage on cognitive performance in son-mother dyads in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Understanding Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated brain pathology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsThere is considerable heterogenicity in clinical outcomes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The aim of this study was to assess whether dystrophin gene (DMD) pathogenic variant location influences upper or lower extremity motor function outcomes in a large prospective cohort.
methodsWe used longitudinal timed and quantitative motor function measurements obtained from 154 boys with DMD over a 10-y period by the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group Duchenne Natural History Study (CINRG-DNHS) to understand how the trajectories of motor function differ based on proximal versus distal DMD pathogenic variants. Proximal variants were defined as located proximal to 5' DMD intron 44, and distal variants as those including nucleotides 3' DMD including intron 44. Distal DMD variants are predicted to alter the expression of short dystrophin isoforms (Dp140, Dp116, and Dp71). We compared various upper extremity and lower extremity motor function measures in these two groups, after adjusting for total lifetime corticosteroid use.
resultsThe time to loss-of-ambulation and timed motor function measurements of both upper and lower limbs over a 10-y period were comparable between boys with proximal (n = 53) and distal (n = 101) DMD pathogenic variants. Age had a significant effect on several motor function outcomes. Boys younger than 7 y of age (n = 49) showed gain in function whereas boys 7 y and older (n = 71) declined, regardless of dystrophin pathogenic variant location. DISCUSSION: The longitudinal decline in upper and lower motor function is independent of proximal versus distal location of DMD pathogenic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.