Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255784›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Learning epistatic gene interactions from perturbation screens.

Kieran Elmes, Fabian Schmich, Ewa Szczurek, Jeremy Jenkins, Niko Beerenwinkel, Alex Gavryushkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kieran ElmesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-8522
Fabian SchmichDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1604-4406
Ewa SzczurekInstitute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1320-6695
Jeremy JenkinsNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-0771
Niko BeerenwinkelDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0573-6119
Alex GavryushkinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-8249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of complex diseases often relies on combinatorial therapy, a strategy where drugs are used to target multiple genes simultaneously. Promising candidate genes for combinatorial perturbation often constitute epistatic genes, i.e., genes which contribute to a phenotype in a non-linear fashion. Experimental identification of the full landscape of genetic interactions by perturbing all gene combinations is prohibitive due to the exponential growth of testable hypotheses. Here we present a model for the inference of pairwise epistatic, including synthetic lethal, gene interactions from siRNA-based perturbation screens. The model exploits the combinatorial nature of siRNA-based screens resulting from the high numbers of sequence-dependent off-target effects, where each siRNA apart from its intended target knocks down hundreds of additional genes. We show that conditional and marginal epistasis can be estimated as interaction coefficients of regression models on perturbation data. We compare two methods, namely glinternet and xyz, for selecting non-zero effects in high dimensions as components of the model, and make recommendations for the appropriate use of each. For data simulated from real RNAi screening libraries, we show that glinternet successfully identifies epistatic gene pairs with high accuracy across a wide range of relevant parameters for the signal-to-noise ratio of observed phenotypes, the effect size of epistasis and the number of observations per double knockdown. xyz is also able to identify interactions from lower dimensional data sets (fewer genes), but is less accurate for many dimensions. Higher accuracy of glinternet, however, comes at the cost of longer running time compared to xyz. The general model is widely applicable and allows mining the wealth of publicly available RNAi screening data for the estimation of epistatic interactions between genes. As a proof of concept, we apply the model to search for interactions, and potential targets for treatment, among previously published sets of siRNA perturbation screens on various pathogens. The identified interactions include both known epistatic interactions as well as novel findings.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEpistasis, GeneticHumansModels, TheoreticalRNA Interference

Identifiers

PMID34255784
PMCPMC8277066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.