Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255725›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

The VICTORY (Investigation of Inflammacheck to Measure Exhaled Breath Condensate Hydrogen Peroxide in Respiratory Conditions) Study: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Observational Study.

Lauren Fox, Jessica Gates, Ruth De Vos, Laura Wiffen, Alexander Hicks, Hitasha Rupani, Jane Williams, Thomas Brown, Anoop J Chauhan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren Fox *Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6152-2107
Jessica Gates *Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7777-0201
Ruth De VosPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4009-7375
Laura WiffenPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-7662
Alexander HicksPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-0759
Hitasha RupaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0150-138X
Jane WilliamsEquine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-6903
Thomas BrownPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-4719
Anoop J ChauhanPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-6114
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · GBHartpury University · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 7% of the world's population is living with a chronic respiratory condition. In the United Kingdom, lung disease affects approximately 1 in 5 people, resulting in over 700,000 hospital admissions each year. People with respiratory conditions have several symptoms and can require multiple health care visits and investigations before a diagnosis is made. The tests available can be difficult to perform, especially if a person is symptomatic, leading to poor quality results. A new, easy-to-perform, point-of-care test that can be performed in any health care setting and that can differentiate between various respiratory conditions would have a significant, beneficial impact on the ability to diagnose respiratory diseases.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to use a new handheld device (Inflammacheck) in different respiratory conditions to measure the exhaled breath condensate hydrogen peroxide (EBC H

methodsWe will perform a single-visit, cross-sectional observational study of EBC H

resultsThe results from this study will be available in 2022, in anticipation of COVID-19-related delays.

conclusionsThis study will investigate the EBC H

Indexed as

asthmabreathing pattern disorderbronchiectasisCOPDdiagnosisexhalationhydrogen peroxideinterstitial lung diseaselung cancerlung diseasesmedical devicepneumonia

Identifiers

PMID34255725
PMCPMC8304107
OpenAlexW3181224439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.