Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255715›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Self-reported Subjective Effects of Analytically Confirmed New Psychoactive Substances Consumed by e-Psychonauts: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study Using a New Internet-Based Methodology.

Marc Grifell, Guillem Mir Fuster, Mireia Ventura Vilamala, Liliana Galindo Guarín, Xoán Carbón Mallol, Carl L Hart, Víctor Pérez Sola, Francesc Colom Victoriano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marc Grifell *Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-5761
Guillem Mir Fuster *Energy Control, Asociació Benestar i Desenvolupament, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-2598
Mireia Ventura VilamalaEnergy Control, Asociació Benestar i Desenvolupament, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-6872
Liliana Galindo GuarínMental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-4772
Xoán Carbón MallolEnergy Control, Asociació Benestar i Desenvolupament, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1652-5488
Carl L HartLaboratory of Neuropsychopharmacology, Department of psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9592-9052
Víctor Pérez SolaMental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-2337
Francesc Colom VictorianoMental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-9030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last few years, the continuous emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has become an important public health challenge. The use of NPS has been rising in two different ways: buying and consuming NPS knowingly and the presence of NPS in traditional drugs as adulterants. The rise of NPS use is increasing the number of different substances in the market to an extent impossible to study with current scientific methodologies. This has caused a remarkable absence of necessary information about newer drug effects on people who use drugs, mental health professionals, and policy makers. Current scientific methodologies have failed to provide enough data in the timeframe when critical decisions must be made, being not only too slow but also too square. Last but not least, they dramatically lack the high resolution of phenomenological details.

objectiveThis study aims to characterize a population of e-psychonauts and the subjective effects of the NPS they used during the study period using a new, internet-based, fast, and inexpensive methodology. This will allow bridging an evidence gap between online surveys, which do not provide substance confirmation, and clinical trials, which are too slow and expensive to keep up with the new substances appearing every week.

methodsTo cover this purpose, we designed a highly personalized, observational longitudinal study methodology. Participants will be recruited from online communities of people who use NPS, and they will be followed online by means of a continuous objective and qualitative evaluation lasting for at least 1 year. In addition, participants will send samples of the substances they intend to use during that period, so they can be analyzed and matched with the effects they report on the questionnaires.

resultsThe research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital del Mar Research Institute on December 11, 2018. Data collection started in August 2019 and was still ongoing when the protocol was submitted (September 2020). The first data collection period of the study ended in October 2020. Data analysis began in November 2020, and it is still ongoing. The authors expect to submit the first results for publication by the end of 2021. A preliminary analysis was conducted when the manuscript was submitted and was reviewed after it was accepted in February 2021.

conclusionsIt is possible to conduct an institutional review board-approved study using this new methodology and collect the expected data. However, the meaning and usefulness of these data are still unknown. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24433.

Indexed as

cathinonesdrugs of abuseeHealthinternetlongitudinalmental healthmobile phoneobservationalonline forumsonline recruitmentpharmacologypsychedelicspsychoactivepsychonauticpsychopharmacologypsychotropicpublic healthsentinelsmart phonesubjective effects

Identifiers

PMID34255715
PMCPMC8285746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.