Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255696›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

User Perspectives on a Resilience-Building App (JoyPop): Qualitative Study.

Aislin R Mushquash, Erin S Pearson, Kayla Waddington, Angela MacIsaac, Shakira Mohammed, Elizabeth Grassia, Savanah Smith, Christine Wekerle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acceptance of a mental health app (JoyPopFrontiers in digital health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aislin R MushquashDepartment of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-1326
Erin S PearsonSchool of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-6246
Kayla WaddingtonSchool of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-156X
Angela MacIsaacDepartment of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8152-8258
Shakira MohammedDepartment of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4798-7474
Elizabeth GrassiaDepartment of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-3259
Savanah SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-1661
Christine WekerleDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-810X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResilience is the capability, resources, and processes that are available to a person or system to adapt successfully in the face of stress or adversity. Given that resilience can be enhanced, using advances in technology to deliver and evaluate the impact of resilience interventions is warranted. Evidence supports the effectiveness of the resilience-building JoyPop app in improving resilience-related outcomes after use; however, experiential data from users is also needed to provide a more comprehensive account of its utility.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore users' experiences with the JoyPop app and their perspectives on its utility.

methodsThis qualitative description study involved a combination of group and one-on-one semistructured interviews with a subset of first-year undergraduate students who participated in a larger evaluation of the JoyPop app. Participants used the app for a 4-week period and were subsequently asked about their frequency of app use, most and least used features (and associated reasons), most and least helpful features (and associated reasons), barriers to use, facilitators of use and continuation, and recommendations for improvement. Data were coded and categorized through inductive content analysis.

resultsThe sample of 30 participants included 24 females and 6 males, with a mean age of 18.77 years (SD 2.30). App use ranged from 1 to 5 times daily (mean 2.11, SD 0.74), with the majority indicating that they used the app at least twice daily. The Rate My Mood, Journal, and SquareMoves features were reported to be used most often, while the Rate My Mood, Journal, and Breathing Exercises features were identified as the most helpful. A number of themes and subthemes pertaining to facilitators of app use (prompts, creating routine, self-monitoring opportunities, expressive opportunities), barriers to app use (editing, lack of variety, student lifestyle), outcomes of app use (increased awareness, checking in with oneself, helpful distraction, emotional control), and recommendations for app improvement (adding more features, enhancing existing features, enhancing tracking abilities, providing personalization) were identified.

conclusionsThis study provides insight into the aspects of the JoyPop app that motivated and benefitted users, as well as measures that can be taken to improve user experiences and promote longer-term uptake. Users were willing to engage with the app and incorporate it into their routine, and they valued the ability to self-monitor, express emotion, and engage in distraction.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSmartphoneappemotioninnovationmental healthmHealthperspectivequalitativeresiliencesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID34255696
PMCPMC8299348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.