Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255663›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2021

Exploratory Analysis of Electronic Cigarette-Related Videos on YouTube: Observational Study.

Zidian Xie, Xueting Wang, Yu Gu, Dongmei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vaping: Public Health, Social Media, and Toxicity.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterizing Anti-Vaping Posts for Effective Communication on Instagram Using Multimodal Deep Learning.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zidian XieDepartment of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-7710
Xueting WangGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-7644
Yu GuGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6350-1254
Dongmei LiDepartment of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-2483

Funding

WNY Center for Research on Flavored Tobacco Products (CRoFT)U54CA228110 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI OSSIP, DEBORAH J · 2018 to 2022
$19.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA228110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has become more popular than cigarette smoking, especially among youth. Social media platforms, including YouTube, are a popular means of sharing information about e-cigarette use (vaping).

objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the content and user engagement of e-cigarette-related YouTube videos.

methodsThe top 400 YouTube search videos related to e-cigarettes were collected in January 2020. Among them, 340 valid videos were classified into provaping, vaping-warning, and neutral categories by hand coding. Additionally, the content of e-cigarette videos and their user engagement (including average views and likes) were analyzed and compared.

resultsWhile provaping videos were dominant among e-cigarette-related YouTube videos from 2007 to 2017, vaping-warning videos started to emerge in 2013 and became dominant between 2018 and 2019. Compared to vaping-warning videos, provaping videos had higher average daily views (1077 vs 822) but lower average daily likes (12 vs 15). Among 161 provaping videos, videos on user demonstration (n=100, 62.11%) were dominant, and videos on comparison with smoking had the highest user engagement (2522 average daily views and 28 average daily likes). Conversely, among 141 vaping-warning videos, videos on potential health risks were the most popular topic (n=57, 40.42%) with the highest user engagement (1609 average daily views and 33 average daily likes).

conclusionsYouTube was dominated by provaping videos, with the majority of videos on user demonstrations before 2018. The vaping-warning videos became dominant between 2018 and 2019, with videos on potential health risks being the most popular topic. This study provides updated surveillance on e-cigarette-related YouTube videos and some important guidance on associated social media regulations.

Indexed as

e-cigaretteelectronic cigarettesinfodemiologyinfoveillanceprovapingsocial listeninguser engagementvaping-warningYouTube

Identifiers

PMID34255663
PMCPMC8292940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.