Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255646›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2021

Integrating Patient Data Into Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review.

Julia Höhn, Achim Hekler, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Jochen Sven Utikal, Friedegund Meier, Frank Friedrich Gellrich, Axel Hauschild, Lars French, Justin Gabriel Schlager and 14 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Julia Höhn *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-5379
Achim Hekler *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-2457
Eva Krieghoff-HenningDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8381-3100
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medicine III, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-5348
Jochen Sven UtikalDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-0241
Friedegund MeierSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-9706
Frank Friedrich GellrichSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-4644
Axel HauschildDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-9587
Lars FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-1486
Justin Gabriel SchlagerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-9367
Kamran GhoreschiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-7517
Tabea WilhelmDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4883-6360
Heinz KutznerDermatopathology Laboratory, Friedrichshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-3050
Markus HepptDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-1825
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3894-8345
Wiebke SondermannDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-3523
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-7858
Bastian SchillingDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8859-4103
Roman C MaronDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2120-901X
Max SchmittDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5133-6768
Tanja JutziDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-2178
Stefan FröhlingNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-0808
Daniel B LipkaNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-7869
Titus Josef BrinkerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-5919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent years have been witnessing a substantial improvement in the accuracy of skin cancer classification using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs perform on par with or better than dermatologists with respect to the classification tasks of single images. However, in clinical practice, dermatologists also use other patient data beyond the visual aspects present in a digitized image, further increasing their diagnostic accuracy. Several pilot studies have recently investigated the effects of integrating different subtypes of patient data into CNN-based skin cancer classifiers.

objectiveThis systematic review focuses on the current research investigating the impact of merging information from image features and patient data on the performance of CNN-based skin cancer image classification. This study aims to explore the potential in this field of research by evaluating the types of patient data used, the ways in which the nonimage data are encoded and merged with the image features, and the impact of the integration on the classifier performance.

methodsGoogle Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect were screened for peer-reviewed studies published in English that dealt with the integration of patient data within a CNN-based skin cancer classification. The search terms skin cancer classification, convolutional neural network(s), deep learning, lesions, melanoma, metadata, clinical information, and patient data were combined.

resultsA total of 11 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of them reported an overall improvement in different skin lesion classification tasks with patient data integration. The most commonly used patient data were age, sex, and lesion location. The patient data were mostly one-hot encoded. There were differences in the complexity that the encoded patient data were processed with regarding deep learning methods before and after fusing them with the image features for a combined classifier.

conclusionsThis study indicates the potential benefits of integrating patient data into CNN-based diagnostic algorithms. However, how exactly the individual patient data enhance classification performance, especially in the case of multiclass classification problems, is still unclear. Moreover, a substantial fraction of patient data used by dermatologists remains to be analyzed in the context of CNN-based skin cancer classification. Further exploratory analyses in this promising field may optimize patient data integration into CNN-based skin cancer diagnostics for patients' benefits.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsDermoscopyHumansNeural Networks, Computerconvolutional neural networkspatient dataskin cancer classification

Identifiers

PMID34255646
PMCPMC8285747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.