Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255392›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Regularized joint water-fat separation with B

Yiming Dong, Kirsten Koolstra, Malte Riedel, Matthias J P van Osch, Peter Börnert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regularized joint water-fat separation with BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiming DongRadiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High-Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-4555
Kirsten KoolstraRadiology, Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-1511
Malte RiedelInstitute for Signal Processing, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5703-7408
Matthias J P van OschRadiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High-Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8959
Peter BörnertRadiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High-Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a new water-fat separation and B

methodsWater-fat separation based on chemical-shift encoding enables robust fat suppression in routine MRI. However, for EPI the different chemical-shift displacements of the multiple fat resonances along the phase-encoding direction can be problematic for conventional separation algorithms. This work proposes a suitable model approximation for EPI under B

resultsThe reference separation algorithm without the proposed spatial shift correction caused water-fat ambiguities in simulations and in vivo experiments. Some spectrally selective fat saturation approaches also failed to suppress fat in regions with severe B

conclusionThe proposed algorithm shows improved suppression of the multi-peak fat components in multi-shot interleaved EPI applications compared to the conventional fat saturation approaches and separation algorithms.

Indexed as

Echo-Planar ImagingWaterAlgorithmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingWaterchemical-shift encodingdiffusioninterleaved EPInavigatorwater-fat

Identifiers

PMID34255392
PMCPMC8596522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.