ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2021
Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response shift in oncology: fact or myth.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Cognitive appraisal processes and health: from bench to bedside.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Opioid-use disorder and reported pain after spine surgery: Risk-group patterns in cognitive-appraisal processes in a longitudinal cohort study.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Associations of cognitive appraisal and patient activation on disability and mental health outcomes: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Individual differences in the long-term impact of the pandemic: moderators of COVID-related hardship, worry, and social support.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Functional Status Correlates of Change and Stability in Appraisal after Spine Surgery: Earlier versus Later Effects.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Depression trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: a secondary analysis of the impact of cognitive-appraisal processes.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Response-shift effects in childhood cancer survivors: A prospective study.Psycho-oncology · 2023Article
- Double-blinded is not better than "mutually enlightened": implications of Lord-Besson et al.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Cognitive Processes during Recovery: Moving toward Personalized Spine Surgery Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Patient life aspirations in the context of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a mixed-methods case-control study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Appraisal and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- What should progress in response-shift research look like?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Rapkin and Schwartz appraisal theory and measure provided a path toward documenting response-shift effects and describing individual differences in ways of thinking about quality of life (QOL) that distinguished people in different circumstances. Recent work developed and validated the QOL Appraisal Profile
methodsThis secondary analysis (n = 1481) included chronically-ill patients and their caregivers from a longitudinal web-based survey (mean follow-up 16.6 months). Data included the QOLAP
resultsThe vast majority (i.e., 80%) of the QOLAP
conclusionsThe present study provides heuristics to support investigators' creating 'discretionary' QOLAP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.