Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34255180›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

A hybrid method of healthcare delivery research and human-centered design to develop technology-enabled support for caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Lauren R Bangerter, Monica Looze, Barbara Barry, Kathleen Harder, Joan Griffin, Meredith Dezutter, Nandita Khera, Sikander Ailawadhi, Karen Schaepe, Kristin Fischer

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren R BangerterUnitedHealth Group Research and Development, Minnetonka, MN, USA. laurenbangerter@uhg.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-2495
Monica LoozeMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Barbara BarryMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kathleen HarderCenter for Design in Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Joan GriffinMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Meredith DezutterMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nandita KheraDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Sikander AilawadhiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Karen SchaepeMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kristin FischerMayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health information technology (HIT) is a widely recognized strategy to encourage cancer patients and caregivers to participate in healthcare delivery in a sustainable and cost-effective way. In the context of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HSCT), HIT-enabled tools have the potential to effectively engage, educate, support, and optimize outcomes of patients and caregivers in the outpatient setting. This study sought to leverage human-centered design to develop a high-fidelity prototype of a HIT-enabled psychoeducational tool for HSCT caregivers. Phase 1 focuses on breadth and depth of information gathering through a systematic review and semi-structured interviews to determine optimal tool use. Phase 2 engages in human-centered design synthesis and visualization methods to identify key opportunities for the HIT design. Phase 3 employs human-centered design evaluation, engaging caregivers to respond to low-fidelity concepts and scenarios to help co-design an optimal tool for HSCT. This study outlines a hybrid method of healthcare delivery research and human-centered design to develop technology-enabled support for HSCT caregivers. Herein, we present a design methodology for developing a prototype of HIT-enabled psychoeducational tool which can be leveraged to develop future eHealth innovations to optimize HSCT.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMedical InformaticsCaregiversDelivery of Health CareHumansTechnologyCaregiversDesign methodologyHealth information technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.