ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021
Validation and performance of a machine-learning derived prediction guide for total knee arthroplasty component sizing.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the design of highly compatible knee prostheses: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- 3D imaging-based AI models outperform demographic models and excel in tibial sizing compared with 2D models in total knee arthroplasty planning: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Reliability of artificial intelligence in predicting total knee arthroplasty component sizes: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Pooled it
- Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Consistently high accuracy of digital 2D templating in total knee arthroplasty across different levels of surgical training.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Reducing surgical trays to cut both carbon emissions and costs in total knee arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- How New Technologies Will Transform Total Knee Arthroplasty from a Singular Surgical Procedure to a Holistic Standardized Process.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for predicting tibial intramedullary nail length.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Body mass index and lower limb diameters in total knee arthroplasty outcomes and surgical planning.Reumatologia · 2025Article
- A deep learning based automatic two-dimensional digital templating model for total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery & related research · 2024Article
- Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using simple X-ray images.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Reliable prediction of implant size and axial alignment in AI-based 3D preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- -A machine learning model to predict surgical site infection after surgery of lower extremity fractures.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of machine learning trends and hotspots in arthroplasty literature over 31 years.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Fully automated assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs following corrective knee osteotomies in patients with valgus or varus deformities.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms for predicting complications after primary total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- The current role of the virtual elements of artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnticipation of patient-specific component sizes prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to avoid excessive cost associated with additional surgical trays and morbidity associated with imperfect sizing. Current methods of size prediction, including templating, are inconsistent and time-consuming. Machine learning (ML) algorithms may allow for accurate TKA component size prediction with the ability to make predictions in real-time.
methodsConsecutive patients receiving primary TKA between 2012 and 2020 from two large tertiary academic and six community hospitals were identified. The primary outcomes were the final femoral and tibial component sizes extracted from automated inventory systems. Five ML algorithms were trained with routinely corrected demographic variables (age, height, weight, body mass index, and sex) using 80% of the study population and internally validated on an independent set of the remaining 20% of patients. Algorithm performance was evaluated through accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean-squared error (RMSE).
resultsA total of 17,283 patients that received one of 9 TKA implants from independent manufacturers were included. The SGB model accuracy for predicting ± 4-mm of the true femoral anteroposterior diameter was 83.6% and for ± 1 size of the true femoral component size was 95.0%. The SGB model accuracy for predicting ± 4-mm of the true tibial medial/lateral diameter was 83.0% and for ± 1 size of the true tibial component size was 97.8%. Patient sex was the most influential feature in terms of informing the SGB model predictions for both femoral and tibial component sizing. A TKA implant sizing application was subsequently created.
conclusionNovel machine learning algorithms demonstrated good to excellent performance for predicting TKA component size. Patient sex appears to contribute an important role in predicting TKA size. A web-based real-time prediction application was created capable of integrating patient specific data to predict TKA size, which will require external validation prior to clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34255175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.