ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021
Robotics in orthopaedic surgery: why, what and how?
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Digital operating room-From dream to workflow].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- National Utilization of Navigation and Robotics in Inpatient Spinal Fusion Remains Low but is Increasing, 2016-2022.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Toward autonomous robotic-assisted and microrobotic surgery.Science advances · 2026Review
- Posterior tibial slope accuracy in robotic-assisted TKA: a risk factor analysis focusing on CPAK phenotypes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted baseplate preparation in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and contemporary review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty: economic impact and workflow efficiency.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Impact of robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty on resident and fellow training in orthopedic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- High accuracy and learning curve improvement of augmented reality in total knee arthroplasty: A single-centre study on 157 patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Review
- The comparison of three dimensional and two dimensional evaluation of varus/valgus stress X-rays following total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Robotics total knee arthroplasty: is an image-based the only solution?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Merits and Limitations of Robotic-assisted Surgery in Improving Precision, Accuracy, and Patient Outcomes in Orthopedic Procedures.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2025Article
- Orthopedic surgical robotic systems in knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- [Digital tools in primary total knee arthroplasty-Prevalence in the German-speaking region].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobotics applied to orthopedics has become an interesting topic both from the surgical point of view and the engineering one. The main goal of those systems is the enhancement of joint arthroplasty surgery, providing the robotic support to precisely and accurately prepare the bone, restore the limb alignment and the physiological kinematics of the joint. Various robotic systems are currently available on the market, each addressing specific kind of surgeries and characterized by a series of specific features that may involve different requirements and/or modus operandi. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn overview of these devices was performed, addressing the different categories in which robots are subdivided in terms of: operations performed, requirements and level of interaction of the surgeon. The main models currently available on the market were addressed and relative studies in the literature were reported and compared, to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of the different technologies.
resultsThe different robotic systems were subdivided in: open/closed platform, image-based/imageless and active/passive/semi-active. Regardless of the typology of robotic system, the main aim is to improve precision and accuracy of the operation. It is to be noted that, regardless of the typology of robotic system, the surgeon is still in charge of the planning and approval of the operation: only the precise and consistent execution of his directives is entrusted to the robot. The positive factors have however to be weighed against the fact that robotic systems involve an important initial investment and most of the times require the surgeons and the staff to learn how to operate them (with a learning curve differing from system to system).
conclusionsEach surgeon, when considering if and which robotic system to adopt, has to properly evaluate the different benefits and drawbacks involved to find the surgical robot that fits his needs the best.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34255170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.